The raw images won't look fuzzy and pixellated if viewed on software that can open them.But I haven’t noticed this before - when I was flying the P3P
But the embeded thumbnails will if enlarged.
The raw images won't look fuzzy and pixellated if viewed on software that can open them.But I haven’t noticed this before - when I was flying the P3P
In my viewer, the jpg is great but the dng is not. And on my screen it’s very obvious.Looking at your images, I'm not sure what problem you are seeing.
The subject in the photo is very close to the lens (less than 3 ft?) and the rest of the photo elements are quite a bit further back.
The subject is clear and sharply focused - check the detail in the T-shirt fabric and hair.
The background details are not so sharp but this is expected when the lens is focused on the close subject due to depth of field issues.
These issues are never going to be a factor in aerial photography where all elements in the photo are well away from the lens.
That's not unusual.In my viewer, the jpg is great but the dng is not. And on my screen it’s very obvious.
SuperThat's not unusual.
Raw image files are not fit for viewing without some processing - just like an uncooked cake is nothing like a cooked one.
Shooting raw images is for people that want to spend time in Photoshop making adjustments.
Unless that's you, you are going to be better off just shooting jpg images.
I've saved a file to dropbox to show how I've tweaked the dng file to show what I think is a good image.
It's easy to get the impression from forums, that you must shoot raw.
But jpg is just fine for most drone flyers, most of the time.
Here are some examples of the quality you can get from jpg images.
Shipping Photography Examples - Above & Beyond Photography
Is your client someone who knows their way around Photoshop and will want to take the time to turn raw images into something useable?Super
I send the raw files to my client who tweaks them
Any recommendations on software to edit the raw files
Yes she’ll edit themIs your client someone who knows their way around Photoshop and will want to take the time to turn raw images into something useable?
Not many would be.
It's more usual for the photographer to supply their client with the finished product.
That sounds so unusual I'll add a comment.Yes she’ll edit them
Photoshop and Lightroom are the most commonly used programs for manipulating raw image files.So I should buy photoshop?
That sounds so unusual I'll add a comment.
A few days ago you didn't know what a raw file was, most non-serious photographers don't.
I would also wonder if your client undertstands raw files and editing them.
Photoshop and Lightroom are the most commonly used programs for manipulating raw image files.
Options I use or have used for DNG RAW are CaptureOne, Lightroom, Luminar, Photoshop, and AirMagic. It really depends on how much control you want over the final image and how much you can spend on the software. Also, some programs have a much bigger learning curve, although there are lots of videos on YouTube to get you started with any of them.
DJI support had me buy a faster microSD card, but that didn't work. Now their engineers are looking at the issue and I hope to get an answer soon. I may have to send the aircraft in for an evaluation, but time is money.
RE: software. I don't want to spend a lot of time learning the software, but would like a better platform to view and modify the faw files. What do you think I should buy?
DJI's help people can sometimes be less than helpful and sometimes give poor advice.DJI support had me buy a faster microSD card, but that didn't work. Now their engineers are looking at the issue and I hope to get an answer soon. I may have to send the aircraft in for an evaluation, but time is money.
RE: software. I don't want to spend a lot of time learning the software, but would like a better platform to view and modify the faw files. What do you think I should buy?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.