you need the antenna attached while flying if not you will see a reduction in the distance the drone can fly
you need the antenna attached while flying if not you will see a reduction in the distance the drone can fly
the re goggles use two frequencies vs the white version only uses one the pago antenna is for the 5.8 GHZ where the 2.4 doesn’t require an antenna
the mavic use duel frequenc,one frequency works better in an urban environment than the other,you should go to dji’s website and read up on it there,i can testify that i get better range with the antenna on then i do with it off in the same environmen.sorry for the ignorance-
I assume the Dji drones are the 2.4 ???
If so, then I do not need the antenna attached when flying my mavic??
sorry for the ignorance-
I assume the Dji drones are the 2.4 ???
If so, then I do not need the antenna attached when flying my mavic??
Just this weekend I met up with other dji pilots and flew my mavic with the black re goggles 5200 ft and didn't lose any signal strength granted I was flying over flat desert and wide open,I've flown in urban areas and sometimes I would have awful signal issues and other times no problem at all.Hey, what are your thoughts on the RE? I am torn in which to buy. I like the RE due to the 50ms lag. But I am hearing nightmarish stories on the range being as low as 100 feet. Have you noticed any distance issues? And can you really tell the different in between the 110ms white goggles and 50ms RE?
Apparently. And suppose to work well like at 4 miles. I'm torn..... I really want the RE but this issue with the zoom kills iySo on the original mavic pro. It’s only 2.4 thus not needing the antenna??
I’ll test myself when I finally get out. Was more curious .
Thanks all
So on the original mavic pro. It’s only 2.4 thus not needing the antenna??
I’ll test myself when I finally get out. Was more curious .
Thanks all