Don't know why people keep insisting on FAA and 400 ft. It is not illegal and neither is 5000ft in a Mavic or any drone used for recreational purposes. There are tons of reasons to fly over 1600ft. I just climbed 3,500 to get to the top of a mountain. Lots to see up there.
The only thing up for debate is what "you" think is safe, dumb, dangerous. And, that is subjective. Sarcastically speaking, I've seen planes in my own neighborhood lower than 400 ft. ANYONE that flies over 200 ft is endangering people and lives, DON"T DO IT!
Doesn't that sound silly?
Some people think there is no reason to fly over 200. Some think 400 is insane. DJI obviously thinks 1,600 is acceptable. I think 6,000+ is fine. Just choose where you fly safely and since there is no law or regulation on the height. Just remember, what you think a max safe height is, IS just your opinion.
Hey, its all subjective, be smart fly smart.
The Mavic will allow you to go to 1600 feet. It is defaulted to 400’. Open settings and change max altitude from 120 meters to 600 meters.very cool, thanks for sharing!! How did you overcome the 400' AGL limit , this looks higher than 400' ?
You can legally go to 1400 ft in this example.
Understood, I also live at 5000ft, my only real point is that we should not discuss flights over 400ft AGL.
I can fly 50 feet AGL up the side of the mountain, but once I’ve gained a total of 500m of elevation it shuts me down. There’s plenty of use cases when you gain more than 500m of elevation without exceeding 400 feet AGL.
Why would anyone want to fly over 400ft. The mavic is too hard to see. Not to mention it's also against FAA rules. Quit posting these questions, it only draws attention that we don't want.
Why would anyone want to fly over 400ft. The mavic is too hard to see. Not to mention it's also against FAA rules. Quit posting these questions, it only draws attention that we don't want.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.