ajkm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2019
- Messages
- 251
- Reactions
- 153
- Age
- 66
It’s a spelling issue - the intended term is “mountain ridge.”What is a mountain rig? Not familiar with this expression
It’s a spelling issue - the intended term is “mountain ridge.”What is a mountain rig? Not familiar with this expression
Given the idea that is referred to of using Litchi to fly a mission that goes beyond VLOS, there is simply no question left as to whether this is “dangerous and illegal.” The reference to “neighbours and local authorities” is entirely irrelevant.Again keep in mind that the rules call for VLOS at all times. Only you know if your neighbors and local authorities are likely to see this as safe and innocent or dangerous and illegal.
When did anyone mention "Canadian mountains"?And I am sure it seems irrelevant in the Canadian mountains but you are legally required to retain direct line of sight DLS.
Given the idea that is referred to of using Litchi to fly a mission that goes beyond VLOS, there is simply no question left as to whether this is “dangerous and illegal.” The reference to “neighbours and local authorities” is entirely irrelevant.
I also think that most here have indicated that this is not a feasible or reasonable project, especially at the level,of experience of the OP.
There’s also the point that Google Earth Pro will totally answer the “friend’s” question as to what is over the mountain ridge, and the viewpoint can be adjusted on GEP to any desired eye height and angle. Something in the OP’s question doesn’t hang together in my view,
I know what Google Earth and other sites say but we have no air port of any nature. There is a hilly pot hole ridden straight section of road going thought a muskeg on it way to Trout Creek. A small salmon stream near by.Kind and respectful intention but difficult to execute.
I think Edna Bay has an airport.....so chase the bear that went over the mountain, by taking the old chap for a flight....might be more cost effective than replacing an MA2.
Safe flying mate ....from Down Under
Have you descended close by your location with your drone and listed to it and how it sounds. It is working hard trying to stay level and descend at speed. To do this it is powering up and down the propellers in fast succession to maintain fast, level, controlled flight.Dave...using more battery flying DOWN/descending as opposed to level, sounds impossible? (All else being equal.) The drone WILL use less energy descending as opposed to flying level.
Maybe when you are descending you are also flying way faster? Even then I'd think flying level would use more battery per unit time. Drones use the vast majority of their battery just holding themselves up in the air...the percentage increase in battery use to fly faster and faster is the smaller percentage of the total energy needed in a given moment.
There IS a sweet spot in efficiency, which with these drones seems to be about 15-20 mph...the propellers are most efficient when moving forward at a "medium" speed as opposed to hovering because the air moving over the blades due to that forward speed (or hovering stationary in a 15mph breeze) adds some lift. That's why a helicopter can fly at a higher altitude if it's moving forward as opposed to hovering (out of ground-effect).
Anyway that's an interesting observation you made there and yes, is something to keep in mind.
Ok so I live by the ocean. So if I fly over this mountain rig that is 2200ft and loss signal I would need to set my return to home altitude to 23 or 2400 feet to clear the mountain rig?
Read post 8... that sounds like the correct answer.2400 feet. The drone will fly as the bird fly straight back to home at is set altitude. So if you went over the hill and down the back side and lost signal. It would go to 2400 feet and come home. If you set it to 23 feet it would dive to it the ground and hover till the battery ran out and fall to the ground with a dead battery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.