meeestermike
Member
Thank you very much for the information!!!The photo in post #32. Ferromagnetic iron in the steel rebar.
A short explanation of compass function, calibration and errors.
Thank you very much for the information!!!The photo in post #32. Ferromagnetic iron in the steel rebar.
A short explanation of compass function, calibration and errors.
In order to establish if you have a wrongly initialized IMU coming from a magnetically deflected compass when you power on your craft you compare the map drone icon direction with reality ... if you have a yaw error, the deviation will not be just some degrees hard to judge ... it will be hard to miss, well over a 30 degree deviation....I am sure though the yaw could be off a few degrees and no one would be the wiser and that is because a visual observation of a screenshot would not be highly accurate.
again, there is n discernable deviation. the craft became uncontrollable about three feet outside of the balcony though. I believe it was the low light conditions and the bypass mode.
But you can be sure if I ever have a mishap again, mavicpilots.com will be the last place I post about it. This is not a place to learn and exchange experiences but rathe to be bashed by other members. This forum is really kind of sucky that way and I am sure discourages others to relate their experiences.
Why do you doubt it - all you have to do is look at the aircraft specifications. In S mode the M2P maximum speed is 20 m/s, and the M3 is 19 m/s. The M3 does climb and descend faster, but that's clearly not what you were referring to in post #8.M3 is quicker. Perhaps max speed is the same, which I doubt, it gets there much faster. It increases/decreases height at 2x the speed, as well.
M3 is quicker. Perhaps max speed is the same, which I doubt, it gets there much faster. It increases/decreases height at 2x the speed, as well.
The speeds shown in the specs are exactly the same as for the Mavic 2.
15 m/s (N mode) 19 m/s (S mode)
It's an aircraft message.Is the 47.2 mph (21.1 m/s) maximum speed reported by the aircraft, or is that an Airdata message?
View attachment 140417
On the contrary, you have that backwards.This is not a place to learn and exchange experiences but rather to be bashed by other members.
There is a difference between max speed and acceleration, which I mentioned in my last posts.
The adjective "fast" means high speed, not acceleration.There is a difference between max speed and acceleration, which I mentioned in my last posts.
What are the acceleration rates?
Not sure where he got the 21 m/s for the M3 - the official DJI specification is 19 m/s. Marginal difference either way. 35% less drag would mean higher acceleration as speed increases since the instantaneous acceleration is (horizontal thrust - drag) divided by mass.DJI Mavic 3 vs DJI Mavic 2 Pro Comparison
DJI launch the Mavic 3. See how it compares to the previous generation Mavic 2 Pro, as well as other DJI camera drones, such as the Air 2S.www.heliguy.com
Not sure how accurate that is, but it states it's a little faster. Also says it's 35% more aerodynamic, which leads me to believe it does indeed accelerate faster than the M2P.
So top speed and acceleration is better?
Not sure where he got the 21 m/s for the M3 - the official DJI specification is 19 m/s. Marginal difference either way. 35% less drag would mean higher acceleration as speed increases since the instantaneous acceleration is (horizontal thrust - drag) divided by mass.
That shorter moment of higher speed doesn't mean much & don't tell us that the software allows higher speeds than what's stated in the specs.I have recorded 47.2 mph (21.1 m/s) maximum speed. It seems the actual maximun speed allowed in firmware is higher than the published specification.
View attachment 140450
And you have compared this with the same stick sensitivity & EXP settings..?M3 is quicker. Perhaps max speed is the same, which I doubt, it gets there much faster...
I think you're perhaps being overly pedantic with fast specifically used to refer to top speed vs acceleration. But I still think it is quicker and faster than the M2P.The adjective "fast" means high speed, not acceleration.
Acceleration is not specified, but is a direct function of tilt angle if mass and drag are similar, which they are for the M2 and M3. They also have the same maximum tilt angle in sport mode (35°), and so the maximum horizontal component of thrust, and therefore maximum acceleration, should be the same.
It's extremely easy to check for yourself.I also don't 100% trust the advertised numbers.
Really?And let's be honest, DJI doesn't have the best record with such things.
Fast and quick?I recommend you guys do the same to see if you see a difference in how fast and quick they are.
Log showed joystick input at 21% and stayed at exactly 21% until it crashed. Meanwhile I had to duck out of the way as the drone buzzed by my head then slammed into the house. You ever been buzzed by an Inspire 2, not fun. I argued with DJI for 2 months over that drone, convinced the RC malfunctioned. They never did look at the flight log, I sent then mine and they had the drone so they had theirs too. Said they couldn’t open mine, and couldn’t get theirs from the drone. They initially called it pilot error, fascinating. I had to get a lawyer to help me with that incident.Your description sounds like a classic yaw error incident.
Interference won't ever cause your drone to fly off like that.
You can still have the flight data looked at to confirm the cause and possibly learn from the incident and how to prevent similar from happening again.
If you use the term "much faster" and then say you didn't mean it actually goes faster, I don't think it's pedantic of me at all to point that out.I think you're perhaps being overly pedantic with fast specifically used to refer to top speed vs acceleration. But I still think it is quicker and faster than the M2P.
You imagine wrong - all those things are irrelevant because in level flight the total motor thrust, T, has to be partitioned, via tilt, so that the vertical component is always equal to the weight of the aircraft, Mg. So at tilt θ,In terms of tilt angle, I imagine just like with FPV, the prop size/angle matters and so does the motor. Are props/motor rpm equal between them?
Then post some logs showing sustained flight faster than the DJI specifications.I also don't 100% trust the advertised numbers. And let's be honest, DJI doesn't have the best record with such things. But I will say, it's a good starting point.
If the flight data showed what you describe, you probably could have achieved a happy outcome without the need for a lawyer.I had to get a lawyer to help me with that incident.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.