As far as I am aware, no beyond line of sight. However, I do jobs where I have to go above byond line of site and I usually contact the FAA through my employer.
Likes:
KevsMavic2
Tell It To the Judge...
- Thread starter Norb_DAIS
- Start date
@ac0j is right. The ONLY time I can fly byond LOS when when we apply for a waiver 90 days in advance to inspect equipment for the DOE. A Hobbiest, has more leaway than a 107 pilot. I am about tired of 107 pilots thinking they can do whatever they want. This is why they are introducing new legistration. In my opinion anways. My insurance for Commercial License to do weddings and things like that is outraguous. It's common sense. All of it is common sense. Don't do things that are going to hurt someone, get in trouble because it just gives reason to introduce more legistration. I don't understand why people think, "Oh im 107 cert, I can do whatever I want. I fly right next to an airport often, I get ATC clearence and I also notifiy the FAA just in case because ATC never takes my info. Be smart, cover your butt.
Likes:
globeguy1 and KevsMavic2
Nice that the judge is taking into account that you did your homework, and that he is taking the time to get it right. Looking forward to hearing the details when he sends you the ruling; thanks for the update!
Likes:
TR Ganey and ff22
Oh, I get it... I tried to watch that empty box on Post #1 that says “this video is unavailable “. 
Last edited:
Likes:
Norb_DAIS and Point Zero
Norb if you case is successful, you will be quoted USA wide as case study for i suspect many thousands of people who face the same unfair charges from money hungry agencies. Well done sir even if it is not found in your favour I would suggest you appeal
Likes:
Norb_DAIS and TR Ganey
Thanks for the support! To everyone who has commented and contributed as well!
I just got a text message from my wife that a letter came in from the court. She wanted to open it up, but I told her to wait until I get home. I'm anxious, but I have to wait out traffic for my long commute, otherwise I'm in the car for almost 2 hours -- it's rush hour and raining here in the Bay Area and traffic is never fun in the rain.
I'll be posting again tonight with the results of the case.
I just got a text message from my wife that a letter came in from the court. She wanted to open it up, but I told her to wait until I get home. I'm anxious, but I have to wait out traffic for my long commute, otherwise I'm in the car for almost 2 hours -- it's rush hour and raining here in the Bay Area and traffic is never fun in the rain.
I'll be posting again tonight with the results of the case.
Likes:
TR Ganey
Ok. Well here it is...
No clarification of control of airspace or any other explanation. Just that I violated the ordinance (No self-propelled model aircraft...) and pay the fine by next week.
I didn't mention earlier that the judge is also a P107 holder, but during the hearing, he did tell me that "this is not an FAA issue, this is a park issue."
I provided him with copies of statement sent to me by the FAA along with the press release from July of last year and the photos of my location outside park property.
I disagree with his statement because I believe it is an issue of regulation of airspace. I expressed that I did due diligence planning the flight using the sectional charts and AirMap, and that the area is not clearly marked...though the officer said otherwise.
Lots of work needs to be done with regard to the education and communication of the rules. It doesn't matter if you're a hobbyist or P107 pilot. I don't claim any special exemption for the rules and will pay the fine as directed by the court. But as more and more people take to the air, it would help if the rules were clearly defined and easy to find.
So guess where I won't be flying my drone?
No clarification of control of airspace or any other explanation. Just that I violated the ordinance (No self-propelled model aircraft...) and pay the fine by next week.
I didn't mention earlier that the judge is also a P107 holder, but during the hearing, he did tell me that "this is not an FAA issue, this is a park issue."
I provided him with copies of statement sent to me by the FAA along with the press release from July of last year and the photos of my location outside park property.
I disagree with his statement because I believe it is an issue of regulation of airspace. I expressed that I did due diligence planning the flight using the sectional charts and AirMap, and that the area is not clearly marked...though the officer said otherwise.
Lots of work needs to be done with regard to the education and communication of the rules. It doesn't matter if you're a hobbyist or P107 pilot. I don't claim any special exemption for the rules and will pay the fine as directed by the court. But as more and more people take to the air, it would help if the rules were clearly defined and easy to find.
So guess where I won't be flying my drone?
New Threads
-
Would you like to make your drone tougher than nails? Stay tuned...- Started by Thunderdrones
- Replies: 0
-
-
FOR SALE - DJI 4 Advanced 4K Camera Drone AS NEW MINT 2 BATTS
- Started by AlanBrixham
- Replies: 0
-
I disagree with the new UK No Fly regs. If you do so sign my petition please
- Started by Lewberry6
- Replies: 6
-
Members online
- PeRo
- Danfe
- The Fat Controller
- Sonerai
- goodlettjr
- borzoiboy
- jprism
- Meta4
- Ken Nash
- Dr0neP1lot
- Bruce low
- bobscheel53
- Mavic1965
- BogeyBlack
- Asulliv54
- Congoblue
- philbr118
- Andy_Bee_1
- dragontw
- Rubenmartz
- Powell.r
- Abfly
- devisger
- payasyoutext
- Toyer
- Lewberry6
- Pilatoroma
- Esoarer
- crazyju
- Ray Singcar
- NCjonNC
- crystal-pete
- justy303
- jagraphics
- hwkacy
- Excel25
- diverdave
- Bunny Too
- JB913
- Agis
- Mavic Dude
- usageUK
- Platinumproman
- Mavco
- Air-v
- Clem
- Agent Smith
- Grog
- sg77
- MichiganMavic