Daskid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2017
- Messages
- 103
- Reactions
- 56
- Age
- 44
I think they would put that on the description if it is indeed multi-coated.The other important question is: are they multi-coated? It doesn't say on DJI's website.
I think they would put that on the description if it is indeed multi-coated.The other important question is: are they multi-coated? It doesn't say on DJI's website.
At $35 for a set of 3, the price would put me off straight away
I think they would put that on the description if it is indeed multi-coated.
Polar Pros cinemas are $80. $35 is pretty fair if they are functional.
That is a pretty big "if" and for that price, my money is on them being of a quality of material that will degrade the image.
These guys kind of know their stuff when it comes to cameras.
That might be the reason they are investing in Hasselblad. On the other hand, I see a lot of positive reviews about DJI cameras from people who earn money by filming stuff. I call them professional filmmakers and I kinda trust them.Erm, the Mavic camera has
(1) a massive red spot / blue fringe in the center of DNG, mostly corrected by their MOV and JPEG routines but somehow not documented or acknowledged by DJI,
(2) a continuing manufacturing defect where the sensor is not aligned with the lenses, giving bad corner focus for a lot of people,
(3) a compression on JPEG so aggressive people use the term "watercolor" to describe it.
DJI integrated a camera because they needed a camera. They know gimbals pretty well (though this one is constrained by its weight/profile), and they know multicopter control pretty well, and they know radio two-way link communication really well. Either the price point and the market they're after means the camera is just not their main focus, or they just don't know cameras all that well.
How are they?DJI Filters
View attachment 4372
How are they?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.