Can someone give a quick rundown on why occusync is superior to wi-fi for the non tech members?
It's pretty much what @Dave Maine wrote. Same radio frequencies (Ocusync uses wi-fi chipsets), but highly optimized for drone control and video downloads.Can someone give a quick rundown on why occusync is superior to wi-fi for the non tech members?
Agree, and occusync 3.0 on FPV drone is a better looking forward to being in the next camera drone.There is no comparison to OccuSync 2.0 as its the best that we have right with these types of drones..
The Occusync allows for the drone to decide the best signal to use allowing you a a more secure flight in a variety of flying conditions.
This is one of the reason why the Air 2 is such a nice upgrade from the Air.
Phantomrain.org
Gear to fly your Mavic in the rain
Coal
.
Thanks - was your Spark in FCC though?I went from a Spark with WiFi to a Mavic 2 with Occusync. With the Spark, signal would drop out even with VLOS. The Spark is a small drone, so it's not too far before it goes out of range. With the Mavic 2, the range you get is literally miles! WAY beyond VLOS and even works behind large obstacles.
I loved my Spark. It was tough as old boots and survived many a good biffing. Shame it didn't have a better gimbal and Occusync 2.
Yes, Ocusync wins by far.Has anyone compared ocusync 2.0 CE to Wifi FCC?
I don't think the CE/FCC power differences matter as much as Ocusync vs Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi is a general-purpose network technology. Ocusync is highly optimized for one set of tasks, drone control and drone video transmission.Has anyone compared ocusync 2.0 CE to Wifi FCC?