...I don't think so. Help me out if I'm missing something.
In a TechRadar article comparing the Mini 3 to the Nano+, they said this:
A drone is not a sailboat. The force vector analysis has nothing in common. There's no centerboard.
"Tacking" a drone against a headwind will only waste power, velocity, and time moving perpendicular to the intended course. It will make slower progress to the target than a straight course. A situation where a drone has barely enough energy left to make it back straight on will not if energy is wasted zigzagging.
If caught downwind, the best procedure is to fly as low as safely and legally possible on a course direct to the landing spot.
In a TechRadar article comparing the Mini 3 to the Nano+, they said this:
"In wind gusts of over 20mph, the Nano+ can struggle when flying into the wind and it can be necessary to lower altitude and take a zig-zag route back to the take-off site."
A drone is not a sailboat. The force vector analysis has nothing in common. There's no centerboard.
"Tacking" a drone against a headwind will only waste power, velocity, and time moving perpendicular to the intended course. It will make slower progress to the target than a straight course. A situation where a drone has barely enough energy left to make it back straight on will not if energy is wasted zigzagging.
If caught downwind, the best procedure is to fly as low as safely and legally possible on a course direct to the landing spot.