it just depends on what the design of the props are in relation to how the drone folds up ,or not for transport, you could put a solid propellor ,on any of the folding type DJI drones ,but in order to fold them you would have to remove them each time, there is really no advantage between folding or solid, the portion of the propellor that provides the thrust is exactly the sameI see that the Master Screw have solid and foldable props (obvious convenience). What is the advantage of the solid props?
got them but I think they are the same as what you already get?If so, how would you rate the noise drop? Did it affect flight performance / duration?
I see that the Master Screw have solid and foldable props (obvious convenience). What is the advantage of the solid props?
Pretty sure the $12 low noise props are identical to the prop you get when you buy the drone originally. All recent DJI camera drone props are "low noise" but if you really want a small reduction in the noise, may I recommend you visit Master AirScrew in the near future.
OK so the solid ones have a more agreeable pitch?My M1P orange MAS props fold, as the originals do, but my Spark props are one piece from MAS, unlike the tiny original folding props.
I don’t mind due to the much less annoying pitch, now used to that ‘less than a minute’ fitting them pre flight and removing later.
OK so the solid ones have a more agreeable pitch?
I too noticed that the Mavic 3 props fit on the rear of the Air 3. However, the Mavic 3 props on the front of the Air 3 touch the frame. I wonder if swapping out the rear props degrades performance?
Pilot Institute did fly the drone for an extra 2 minutes. That didn't elaborate about the performance and re-interated "do this at your own risk". I'm sure someone will test them soon
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.