Your image looks exactly as the sky should\did. I
As you said, many think you should only use raw..others say otherwise. It's like that all over the place in photography. I went with DNG because after jpg compression there was lots of detail lost when zooming in. The full 178mp stitch photo (vignette aside) had so much more detail further away. But that was a few months ago i last did it, so maybe i'm confusing the auto-generated pano with the detail loss, which is obvious.
Ok i will try that tomorrow with just the jpg.
Thanks a bunch.
As you said, many think you should only use raw..others say otherwise. It's like that all over the place in photography. I went with DNG because after jpg compression there was lots of detail lost when zooming in. The full 178mp stitch photo (vignette aside) had so much more detail further away. But that was a few months ago i last did it, so maybe i'm confusing the auto-generated pano with the detail loss, which is obvious.
Ok i will try that tomorrow with just the jpg.
Thanks a bunch.