I saw an ad for AOPA on our newsletter. Currently a member of AMA. Does AOPA offer enough to belong to both?
Really? Check out this page on AMA political action.If the majority of UAS operators in the US joined AMA can you imagine the group #'s and potential benefits?
But the AMA was hesitant to embrace MultiRotors (and IMHO rightfully so for a while) but they are coming around.
IMHO we NEED to join and let our $$ do some talking but unfortunately the AMA can't work with Political Affiliations so we would have NO lobby support
As I read their copy, they do offer automatic liability insurance up to $2.5 M for recreational users. $25 K accident & medical coverage, some accidental death coverage and $1,000 theft, fire & accident coverage. Sincerely doubt anything but the liability insurance would ever be of value. I agree that they aren't really "our cup of tea" and it appears that AOPA is more in sync with quadcopters.I'm curious. Why did you join AMA? Did you see anything beneficial to drones with the AMA?
Does paying $70-$150/year to the AOPA really get you anything?
Really? Check out this page on AMA political action.
Please correct me if it’s tangential.Government Advocacy | Academy of Model Aeronautics
Protecting the hobby, sport, and educational use of model aviation.www.modelaircraft.org
There is an AMA flying area about ten minutes away. Problem is that they have one little corner area where drones are allowed. Pretty much a joke as alot of folks back yards are bigger...If the majority of UAS operators in the US joined AMA can you imagine the group #'s and potential benefits?
But the AMA was hesitant to embrace MultiRotors (and IMHO rightfully so for a while) but they are coming around.
IMHO we NEED to join and let our $$ do some talking but unfortunately the AMA can't work with Political Affiliations so we would have NO lobby support
There is an AMA flying area about ten minutes away. Problem is that they have one little corner area where drones are allowed. Pretty much a joke as alot of folks back yards are bigger...
EDIT: I was actually going to join to be able to use the field until I found out about the limitation.
Having been a member of AMA for 34 years, and being a RC Helicopter pilot since day one (I fly RC airplanes and drones also). I have seen a lot of AMA fields that restrict RC Helicopter and now drone flights to a limited area. I was chased off one Southern California Public RC field by the Park Ranger because I was flying my helicopter around the pattern with other fixed wing aircraft. I was told that i am not allowed to do that and I am restricted to a hover circle. When I asked why, I was asked to leave or be arrested. I have seen this same type of segregation at multiple RC fields across the country, ever at the AMA home site in Muncie. Now that the FAA has classified ALL RC aircraft as drones, AMA needs to take a look at themselves. One of that biggest RC Helicopter events is at AMA Headquarters yet the segregation happens at other times of the year at that same site. If AMA wants to represent all of the RC Pilots in the country, then it needs to support all of the RC Pilots in the country. AMA is slowly getting on the band wagon for drones and has made a lot of progress in behalf of their official flying fields. But there is a long way to go. The RC world is changing and the FAA is changing to try to keep up, and keep control. AMA doesn't seem to want to change as it will affect many types of RC flying its members do.
Fortunately, my local club has no restrictions on types of aircraft that fly (except restrictions established by the city (size and noise), who's property we fly on). And we all take turns flying.