A light aircraft collided with an object as it was approaching the runway and the media ran it as a drone strike. (What else would put the media into a scare frenzy?)
CASA inspectors (Aust FAA) being professional weren't so quick to jump to that conclusion and said that they'd do a careful forensic inspection and give their conclusion in due course. They just reminded drone pilots to use the CASA app and enjoy themselves by flying safe and within the guidelines.
The press of course still ran the line that it was a drone. What else could it have been to put such a dent into the wing? If it was a bird there would have been some blood. A drone makes better news.
So.. today, CASA presented their findings. DNA forensic evidence showed that the plane collided with a bat.
Interestingly, some locals had indicated that there were some bat sightings. Of course a plane hitting a drone makes for better news than a bat.
The Channel Ten News reported the findings but still ran with a picture of a drone. Are we at all surprised?
CASA inspectors (Aust FAA) being professional weren't so quick to jump to that conclusion and said that they'd do a careful forensic inspection and give their conclusion in due course. They just reminded drone pilots to use the CASA app and enjoy themselves by flying safe and within the guidelines.
The press of course still ran the line that it was a drone. What else could it have been to put such a dent into the wing? If it was a bird there would have been some blood. A drone makes better news.
So.. today, CASA presented their findings. DNA forensic evidence showed that the plane collided with a bat.
Interestingly, some locals had indicated that there were some bat sightings. Of course a plane hitting a drone makes for better news than a bat.
The Channel Ten News reported the findings but still ran with a picture of a drone. Are we at all surprised?
