When someone wants to answer your request they will. Please stay civil folks.Nothing eh? All verbal praise but no samples to download and look at. Amazing. Every camera I consider you are able to find DNG / raw files to look at before putting out the funds but not this particular drone.
Yep, and hopefully that will help the next person looking for the same info because I am done here. I don’t have the time or bandwidth for comments as rude and uncalled for as the one above yours.When someone wants to answer your request they will. Please stay civil folks.
Yours was as bad as his. If we can’t be civil I Will close this.Yep, and hopefully that will help the next person looking for the same info because I am done here. I don’t have the time or bandwidth for comments as rude and uncalled for as the one above yours.
Comments like that go against what a community is about and drive people away so congrats.
Thanks for offering. I would say fairly detailed subjects anywhere from 500” feet away to a few miles. I would be using this to get compressed aerial landscapes, skiers on runs at medium distance, River scenes for conservation purposes.What sort of samples are you looking for? I'll be happy to shoot a few photos for you.
Any excuse to fly.
No problem but just curious, if you use any of the pictures you get and then publish them do you give them a credit for them.Thanks for offering. I would say fairly detailed subjects anywhere from 500” feet away to a few miles. I would be using this to get compressed aerial landscapes, skiers on runs at medium distance, River scenes for conservation purposes.
I’m doing more TV commercials and documentary work so the Cine aspect is a no brainer, the outlier has been how well this secondary cam has been doing since the FW update has allowed it to shoot DNG files.
To the mod, sorry if my second post on here sounded rude but I have been looking for samples for weeks now.
I posted about my impressions of the tele lens here:Thanks for offering. I would say fairly detailed subjects anywhere from 500” feet away to a few miles. I would be using this to get compressed aerial landscapes, skiers on runs at medium distance, River scenes for conservation purposes.
It's a good question to ask anyone who might post this type of request.No problem but just curious, if you use any of the pictures you get and then publish them do you give them a credit for them.
Again just curious..
Thank you I was just curious. I still don’t have my head around thisIt's a good question to ask anyone who might post this type of request.
My answer is simple, I run a very sucessful commercial and fine art photography business in it's 35th year. I have zero interest or inclination in reproducing or even sharing in any way this type of image that the other poster is possibly going to offer up.
I'm very strict about copyright and pay that full respect to the work of others. I hope others here do the same.
Thank you I was just curious. I still don’t have my head around this
cop y right stuff.
thanks
dc
I posted about my impressions of the tele lens here:
Mavic 3 Tele Lens
I see some members dismissing the tele lens that's incorporated into the Mavic 3 and confess that I was initially skeptical about it. With a fixed aperture and dinky 1/2 inch sensor, I didn't think it would be capable of producing the quality I wanted. It definitely has limitations and can't...mavicpilots.com
Post #5 gives a link to some full-size jpg images
My work usually involves shooting fast moving subjects and bracketing exposure, so I usually shoot jpg and didn't have any dng samples to share.Thanks, those images and insights are helpful.
Sorry. Comment deleted. We both got off on the wrong foot. All's well that ends well.Yep, and hopefully that will help the next person looking for the same info because I am done here. I don’t have the time or bandwidth for comments as rude and uncalled for as the one above yours.
Comments like that go against what a community is about and drive people away so congrats.
Good of you to say soSorry. Comment deleted. We both got off on the wrong foot. All's well that ends well.
Here you go ... a few samples from around the local university campusThanks, those images and insights are helpful.
Here you go ... a few samples from around the local university campus
No high art ... they're just samples
A few might be 1x/7x comparison shots
Tele DNG samples - Google Drive
drive.google.com
Thanks mate, much appreciated. Do you any wide shots of that area taken with the main M43 camera at ISO100?OK, now this is what I have been after, *super* helpful!
It looks even across the frame, little to no CA and can sharpen up well enough. In using Photoshop's Enhance feature it can hold up to that kind of enlargement. The lighting is nice and even so you have highlights and shadows well represented and that allows me to push and pull it around in post quite a bit.
The wide and tight shots are showing me the Q/C in terms of both lenses, it's pretty good overall. Some reports of the wide being way the heck off in terms of centering in other posts like on the DJI forum had me a bit concerned but these look within what I have come to expect from DJI as in-spec.
I'll take a closer look tomorrow AM but all in all, a huge thanks for this!
Thanks mate, much appreciated.Here you go ... a few samples from around the local university campus
No high art ... they're just samples
A few might be 1x/7x comparison shots
Tele DNG samples - Google Drive
drive.google.com
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.