I am very new and green to the world of drones, but i my efforts to catch up and get educated I have seen a ton YouTube videos which are often very informative and entertaining, I am sure many of you here are posting so thank you!
I notice that a great many of the folks filming these videos in the U.S appear (at least to my eye) are filming BVLOS. I have seen a number of videos when looking at their controller there is no way (unless they are Superman) that they can keep site of their UAS. I am wondering why so many do it? Do you do it and how often? How are they posting these vids and not afraid of repercussions? - do you have 107 or you don’t care?
I hope to be smaller filming structures and opening shots of the host for a TV show I am working on, so really don’t need to fly far, plus I am just so new I wouldn’t trust myself or want to break regulations when I’m just about to take 107. Not judging here, but I see so many examples of this online, so I’m just curious about this.
I mostly fly VLOS, but only because BVLOS isn't yet legal except under very limited circumstances.
You can draw an imprecise distinction between drone pilots who come to droning from being manned aircraft pilots, and those who come to droning from photography. I come from the "pilot" heritage.
For me, flying is all about
going places. Just flying around the pattern (VLOS analog for this example) gets boring pretty quickly. Don't get me wrong, the video on my Mini-
2s runs non-stop from engine start to landing. But the flying is the real reason for doing it. By watching where you're going on the screen, you can get a sense that you are riding the drone. The ultimate extension of that is FPV, which I haven't yet had the chance to experience.
I'm blessed by having a wide range of cool places to fly within VLOS of my house (I live on one side of a canyon), but I'd love to go farther up and down the canyon than I do, and peek over the edges of the ridges to see what's on the other side.
The key difference, perhaps, is between *watching* the drone, and *riding* the drone.
Farther out than a couple of hundred feet (if even that), I think the situational awareness and collision avoidance benefits...the actual safety benefits...from always maintaining VLOS are mostly trivial, and vastly overrated from a statistical perspective. To understand that, it's essential to focus on *probability*, rather than *possibility*. The fact that some Bad Thing is theoretically *possible* is largely irrelevant for making rational risk mitigation decisions. The right question is, "What are the odds?"
I realized a bit ago that part of my perspective is framed by the fact that I learned to fly in the Los Angeles basin, which is a virtual beehive of manned aircraft of all sizes buzzing around. Some manned aircraft pilots who learned to fly in relatively rural areas, just won't go to places that busy. On the other hand, one time when I went on vacation in Hawaii and rented a plane there, flying in and out of Honolulu international was a piece of cake for me.
I want to fly BVLOS because I want to *ride* the drone to a larger number of interesting places, farther away, and see what I can see. The only reason I don't do that routinely, is because it's not yet legal.
Your original question was about why people might want to fly BLVOS. Hopefully this provides some insight into the answer to that question.
The key is to fly *safely*, and safety and legality are very distinct things, which sometimes overlap.
Fly safe!
TCS