So, is it your contention that your statement is accurate?.
Please explain the what is it that you call the critical infrastructure claim.
Chinese citizen uses drone to photograph US Navy shipyard
- Thread starter Flightplan
- Start date
So, is it your contention that your statement is accurate?.
Please explain the what is it that you call the critical infrastructure claim.
Read a little further down in the document you cited. Or see the excerpts in post #18. Both issues seem pretty cut-and-dried.
BobaFut
Well-Known Member
Why is that a fair assumption? Visitors are allowed on the base, VIPs, press, and many others are given tours...*satellites exist.* This is all happening out in the open air. What about private or commercial planes that fly nearby that give a view onto the shipyard? While there are systems within a ship that are classified and specs/capabilities that are classified, I don't know that it's safe to assume that "a submarine is being assembled here" is necessarily classified. I would bet that any photos this guy took are not much different than what you could find on Google Earth or wikipedia.
To me this seems like a case of flying while being Chinese, regardless of his intent. If the guy was white I doubt that he would've raised anyone's suspicions. I agree that the whole situation does seems suspicious because of his behavior, but I also have to question the risk/reward calculus for a foreign government in attempting such a thing and it doesn't make a ton of sense.
The regulation cited earlier says that it's covered by the prohibition on photography and such.
"(f) Any commercial establishment engaged in the development or manufacture of classified military or naval arms, munitions, equipment, designs, ships, aircraft, or vessels for the United States Army, Navy, or Air Force."
Amen. Sensitive things in shipyards are either housed indoors, inside the vessel, or shrouded to prevent them from being visible to Russian and Chinese surveillance satellites. And just in general, it's difficult to imagine what useful information could be obtained from photos and videos shot with consumer-grade drones.
anotherlab
Well-Known Member
A ship in a naval yard that is out in the open can still be classified. As you mentioned, it's a moot point when China's spy satellites are just as good as ours now. The Wired article did mention that he was charged with violating WWII era laws.
Being a Chinese national raised the suspicions of the homeowner of the tree that the drone crashed into and with the police. He did not help his case by leaving town right after he was asked by the police to stay.
bitsbytes
Active Member
18 USC 795/796 does not apply to anything visible in public. Otherwise aviation photographers would be arrested for taking photos of military aircraft. See Toledo Blade v. United States, Genovese v. Town of Southampton, Askins v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, etc.
Clipper707
Well-Known Member
I saw a Nikkei Asia headline today. Shi Fengyun, the Chinese student, plead guilty.
After reading through this thread, I'm amazed at the ignorance of those who believe Google Earth photos or Chinese satellites make realtime intelligence obsolete. This is the kind of thinking that dismisses a Chinese spy balloon as a weather balloon.
After reading through this thread, I'm amazed at the ignorance of those who believe Google Earth photos or Chinese satellites make realtime intelligence obsolete. This is the kind of thinking that dismisses a Chinese spy balloon as a weather balloon.
Uh yeah, not surprised. Read more about the plea (bargain) here: Chinese student pleads guilty to violating U.S. espionage act
Otherwise: no comment.
Has a pay wall
Last edited by a moderator:
Clipper707
Well-Known Member
Thanks, that's the exact headline I saw, but I lack a subscription to get past the paywall and have used up my free articles. I googled the name and saw other articles.
Here is why this guy was up to no-good. Let's reverse this culturally. American goes to a foreign country, uses drone to take pictures and video of military stuff. How does that outcome generally turn out? This is about being a smart traveller also. Avoid obvious things that can get you in trouble.
I bet he thought he was now in a free country and didn't have to worry too much about getting caught up in anything if he didn't actually intent to do anything wrong. He thought wrong; this country has changed since 9/11. Unlike Americans who know they are walking into a trap but they go anyway and get hemmed up. If he was a Canarian instead of Chinese, they probably would have let him go after they found out he didn't have any incriminating photos and that he wasn't actually spying for the government of the Canary Islands.
When Stasi is questioning you, I think you almost have to have a German-to-Chinese translator just in case you don't fully understand.....oh, wait. Wrong case. Ok, looks like his lawyer is of Chinese descent so it is likely they wanted to make sure he fully understand what he was pleading out to. Or, maybe the translator was responsible for receiving instructions and directions from the CCP on how to proceed. Either way, it's not uncommon for the parties to have a translator in the room, helps with the inevitable "appeal" that comes, not for the case that you were forced into accepting, but for the maximum sentence that you are clearly about to receive. Obviously there's a bit of tongue-in-cheek in this response.
anotherlab
Well-Known Member
It's common in the US to have graduate students who are not native-English speakers. I've interviewed many of them for software development roles and their level of proficiency is across the board. In Shi's case, his academic advisor is also a native-Chinese speaker.
It's one thing to do coursework for a M.S. degree where you are dealing with the same people and have more experience with understanding their speech patterns as opposed to being in a courtroom with various people with regional accents coming from you at all sides. And it's easier for the officials to understand a translator than someone who may not speak English fluently.
Chip
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2017
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reactions
- 2,494
Just curious, have any of you traveled with your drone to a different state in order to take photos or video of the HQ of an international defense, aerospace, and security company which delivers products and services for air land, space and naval forces as well as advanced electronics, security, and information technology? If so, have you ever been asked why you are taking such images and been unable to articulate a reason even though highly educated and assisted by translators and lawyers?
Last edited:
Chip
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2017
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reactions
- 2,494
Excerpts from the agreed statement of facts in plea agreement signed by Shi and his attorney:
"SHI purchased the drone referenced above on January 3, 2024. SHI first flew the drone a little before midnight the night of January 5, 2024. SHI flew the drone around BAE Systems Shipbuilding and General Dynamics
NASSCO in Norfolk, Virginia, and took pictures of drydocked U.S. naval vessels.
SHI did not return to the University of Minnesota after the incident in Newport News. He was apprehended by law enforcement on January 18, 2024, in California before boarding a one-way flight to China.
No pictures were taken by SHI’s drone on the night of January 5, 2024, that did not contain U.S. naval vessels located at BAE Systems Shipbuilding and General Dynamics NASSCO in Norfolk, Virginia."
Did you get the part about taking photos at midnight and then fleeing to California and trying to board a one way flight to China? Sound normal to you?
"SHI purchased the drone referenced above on January 3, 2024. SHI first flew the drone a little before midnight the night of January 5, 2024. SHI flew the drone around BAE Systems Shipbuilding and General Dynamics
NASSCO in Norfolk, Virginia, and took pictures of drydocked U.S. naval vessels.
SHI did not return to the University of Minnesota after the incident in Newport News. He was apprehended by law enforcement on January 18, 2024, in California before boarding a one-way flight to China.
No pictures were taken by SHI’s drone on the night of January 5, 2024, that did not contain U.S. naval vessels located at BAE Systems Shipbuilding and General Dynamics NASSCO in Norfolk, Virginia."
Did you get the part about taking photos at midnight and then fleeing to California and trying to board a one way flight to China? Sound normal to you?
Chip, tell me you don't completely believe all of this right? The fact is, we just don't know. Some of it may be fact but it doesn't make sense. Yet the government offered his a plea deal since they had nothing. They scared the crap out of him about Gitmo or Super Max or whatever military barracks is top of the list, Leavenworth. So he quickly accepted the deal and repeated what they told him: that he might be able to get on with his life and finish his studies and put this behind him but in fact, he'll probably go to jail and then get deported. And, I'm ok with this deal because the plea bargain is essential for the efficient operation of the judicial system but I'm not happy that we don't get to know what really happened and why the government thinks they caught a spy....strike that, they didn't catch anyone, he got turned in. Are we forgetting the part where an American citizen was slammed for doing the same thing? There's no real benefit to using drones to spy on the military inside the US, that doesn't make sense. It's too risky, it too obvious, and the juice is not worth the squeeze. Unless there are hundreds of these and no one is getting caught until they f* it up like SHI. Those balloons created this nonsense.
DARKSeifer
Well-Known Member
I guess they forgot the drone training on the Chinese spy agency. They also forgot to tell him to use google maps, oh, it's so complicated.
It's so hard to just pick a normal pair of binoculars or a Nikon P1000 and report the ships that are there to China... guess he also missed that class.
Watch out, spies everywhere!
There's a million reasons to fly a drone and to do with your life whatever you want, specially when no pics were even found in the drone.
PS: You just go to this location with a Nikon P1000 and hand helded, in less than 10 seconds you record a video of all the ships that are there at the moment and then upload it to the Chinses spy agency through 4G in nearly real time. You don't need to do the idiot with a noisy drone that emmits RID and Aeroscope and can be detected with bird radars or RF scanners.
That's how intel is gathered, not with a drones, ballons or similar sensationalist-paranoic nonsense.
It's so hard to just pick a normal pair of binoculars or a Nikon P1000 and report the ships that are there to China... guess he also missed that class.
Watch out, spies everywhere!
There's a million reasons to fly a drone and to do with your life whatever you want, specially when no pics were even found in the drone.
PS: You just go to this location with a Nikon P1000 and hand helded, in less than 10 seconds you record a video of all the ships that are there at the moment and then upload it to the Chinses spy agency through 4G in nearly real time. You don't need to do the idiot with a noisy drone that emmits RID and Aeroscope and can be detected with bird radars or RF scanners.
That's how intel is gathered, not with a drones, ballons or similar sensationalist-paranoic nonsense.
Last edited:
Not only that, but having a translator prevents the defense from later claiming he didn't understand the questions.
Similar threads
DJI Drone Deals
New Threads
-
-
Air 3 Upper Thames Rowing Club, Henley on Thames
- Started by Pacefast
- Replies: 1
-
-
Mavic 2 Pro Brushless Motor Disassembly Bearing and Arbor shaft
- Started by jftman
- Replies: 8
-
Forum statistics
