Were you not asking about (not what to do) since you descended, but the warnings you received (in Chinese)?
Close Encounter with Manned Aircraft - Flight Log Link
- Thread starter SlugHead
- Start date
DaveS
Well-Known Member
I live in a small city in the USA (pop 80,000). Not a lot of air traffic here. Only one, small passenger airport with just 4 flights a day in and out. However, there is a very active flight school at the university and their student pilots often fly at all sorts of low altitudes. So, I'm always on the lookout for them. Fortunately, most of their planes make enough noise that I hear them well before I see them. I rarely fly about 200' so getting down quickly to an altitude that they will not be at, is easy enough. We also have a "Flight for Life" helicopter that services local hospitals. You never know when they'll be flying. If I'm doing a lot of flying in the city, I call them to let them know where I am and when and I ask if their pilots are flying when I'm planning to be out. I've never had anything even close to a near-miss with a plane or helicopter but I used to fly an Inspire 1, which I think was easier for as fixed wing aircraft to see. With the Mavic 2 Pro I'm flying now, I can't imagine any pilot could see it. That's why I like the suggestions I've seen in other strings on this forum, that we use lights on our drone ALL the time and put some bright colors on them. This might make it easier for a pilot to see and, I hope, make it easier for me to see so I maintain VLOS.
Guitarzan
Well-Known Member
Can't argue with the law of physics! What's more amazing is that Issac Newton figured all this out back in the 18th century.
But you have to understand the law of physics. As a more extreme example to illustrate, which would you rather have hit your windshield, a 20 lb bird or a 2 lb steel ball?
The 2 lb steel ball.
Plexiglass is extremely strong and likely it will not penetrate the cockpit.
The bird is probably going to do more damage, not to mention obstruct vision a lot worse, and if it goes up into the mast of my helicopter, I would guess the bird would be worse. Bullets and birds, concern me more than drones.
Plexiglass is extremely strong and likely it will not penetrate the cockpit.
The bird is probably going to do more damage, not to mention obstruct vision a lot worse, and if it goes up into the mast of my helicopter, I would guess the bird would be worse. Bullets and birds, concern me more than drones.
Last edited:
Guitarzan
Well-Known Member
That's definitely the wrong answer. No aircraft windshield, even commercial, would survive a 2 lb steel ball impact. The ball wouldn't even see most GA or helicopter windshields, and it wouldn't stop in the cockpit either. The 20 lb bird is going to be bad too, at least with GA windshields, but simply cannot exert the same forces as the steel.
Yes, but it's Newton's 2nd law that you have to worry about, not the definition of momentum.
How many of you here have take a sledge hammer to a windshield from a plane, or helicopter?
They are not fragile like an automobile windshield.
Myself, and friends, have taken hammers to old windows out of aircraft, OMG are they strong! It might be years until we change another one due to yellowing and scratching, but when it does happen, I will video hitting it with a 4 lb sledge hammer.
They are not fragile like an automobile windshield.
Myself, and friends, have taken hammers to old windows out of aircraft, OMG are they strong! It might be years until we change another one due to yellowing and scratching, but when it does happen, I will video hitting it with a 4 lb sledge hammer.
Not GA aircraft - military maybe. I've done controlled terminal ballistics testing on these structures - you are way overestimating their strength.
And I expect that you have seen the damage that smaller birds can do to aircraft windshields and airframe - do those look like they would have survived your sledgehammer?
Watch "Bird Strike to helicopter windshield" on YouTube
A 20 lb bird is also very large, and stands a lot better chance of hitting someone inside, than a tiny ball, that would likely miss the humans. The mess, of blood and guts, from geese, that is left, is outrageous. It is hard as heck to see afterwards, not to mention the butt hole pucker factor of flying into geese. Lets say both the steel ball, and goose or other large bird, do penetrate the windshield, their size probably means the ball has an estimated 10% chance of hitting me in the face, compared to the birds 25% chance. Watching numerous blows, from numerous people, with a 4lb hammer, just bounce off the windows, while we took swings, I still will take my chances with the 2lb steel ball thanks.
A 20 lb bird is also very large, and stands a lot better chance of hitting someone inside, than a tiny ball, that would likely miss the humans. The mess, of blood and guts, from geese, that is left, is outrageous. It is hard as heck to see afterwards, not to mention the butt hole pucker factor of flying into geese. Lets say both the steel ball, and goose or other large bird, do penetrate the windshield, their size probably means the ball has an estimated 10% chance of hitting me in the face, compared to the birds 25% chance. Watching numerous blows, from numerous people, with a 4lb hammer, just bounce off the windows, while we took swings, I still will take my chances with the 2lb steel ball thanks.
in the USA Aircraft, are not allowed to fly below 500 feet unless taking off and landing, however, a drone has to yield the ALL aircraft, so even if he is at 50 feet and you do not avoid him and hit him, you loose, even if you try to avoid him and hit him you loose, last but not least what story is the new going to. run even if the airplane is at 100 feet? Will the story be airplane has drone, or drone hits airplane.
That's a fast 2½-inch diameter steel projectile coming through the windshield. If it hits you pretty much anywhere you are dead. Your choice of course, but I'll take the goose any day.
That's simply not true, with helicopters commonly operating below 500 ft:
§91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General.
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. If the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface—
(1) A helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA; and
(2) A powered parachute or weight-shift-control aircraft may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
The ADS-B system can alert the drone pilot of other nearby aircraft. Not all aircraft emit ADS-B. The warning is shown in the DJI app with a tone. Its currently only available on the MA2
Similar threads
DJI Drone Deals
New Threads
-
Air 3 Fleetwood Wrecks - abandoned boats...- Started by AlbionDrones
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
Forum statistics
