As I said, I have very good eyesight ....100/100 ....
Count me skeptical.
The main variable in human eyesight is optics. Rod/cone density, i.e. the "pixels" on the "sensor" does not vary much.
The retina, with perfect optics, is capable of resolving 0.008°. Much below this and the eye simply can't resolve what's being projected on the retina.
At 3 miles, a 6 inch drone body covers 0.0015°, far below the resolution of the human retina, no matter how good one's cornea, aqueous humor, lens, eye shape, and vitreous humor focus the image on the retina. At 0.0015°, there will not be enough differential light to stimulate a single rod on the retina, let alone a cone (color), which are less dense than rods (brightness).
There is a difference between visual acuity, driven by the optics of the eye, and resolution. Those with the best, distortion-free acuity, a.k.a. 20/10 vision, are still limited by the resolution of the retina, which maxes out at 0.008° of arc.
This is about 5 inches at 3280 ft, or ⅔ of a mile. At 1 mile, it takes a drone body nearly 8 inches to just barely be distinguishable as a faint dot against the background.
People that claim to see their drone at one mile and beyond are probably seeing "floaters", and the older they are, the chance they're seeing a bit of vitreous detachment goes up, especially after 60.