CanadaDrone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 2,176
- Reactions
- 2,064
Lets rephrase that a bit...
iPhone XS is 660 NITS - Controller is 1000 nits (1 nit = 1 cd/m2). That means an iPhone is just about exactly 2/3's as bight as the controller - which is quite a lot more than "barely half" as per your statement - which I would interpret as less than 50% as bright?
My chart-plotter on my boat is 1200 nits and that is just about reasonable in bright sunlight with a sun-cover. I would have wished it was 1500 though. The suncover (sunbrella top) covers the direct sun - but all the reflections from the water makes the issues. But for sailing without my sun top - I would really like 1500+ NITS.
So for most situations I think the controller at 1000 NIT will be ok - but in very bright scenes better brightness would be better (on the water in the sun - or in snow with sun) - which probably is why Crystal Sky is available in the Ultra model with 2000 NITS.
The intention was to indicate a little over half, sorry if you misinterpreted that. I think the OP gets the message without arguing about semantics. The crystal sky is a lot brighter than an iPhone XS and resolution is similar, I believe that is what he wanted to know.
After holding the display and comparing it to my iPhone 6s I see a difference but it’s not significant.
Are you talking quality or brightness? I wouldn't be surprised if quality is similar but the Crystal Sky is a lot brighter assuming it can actually reach it's advertised brightness. iPhone 6s brightness is only around 550 cd/m2.