DJI Avata 2 and Remote Controller 3

[PHZ]

Not certain this the right forum for this so redirect me if appropriate.
I am flying an Avata 2 with Goggles 3 and a motion controller. I am wondering what the Remote Controller 3 would give me in additional capabilities. Then I will decide if that is worth the additional $200.
Thanks.

 

[rgarjr]

I only fly with the rc3 since I like flying in manual mode. You can use the RC to practice in fpv simulators

 

[mavic3usa]

Not certain this the right forum for this so redirect me if appropriate.
I am flying an Avata 2 with Goggles 3 and a motion controller. I am wondering what the Remote Controller 3 would give me in additional capabilities. Then I will decide if that is worth the additional $200.
Thanks.

You must have RC3 in order to fly manual mode (which is one step above sport mode). The MC is unable to put the Avata 2 into manual mode. While in manual mode, you control the drone differently, it's faster, it can do acrobatic tricks. Your drone is not longer under the strict control of GPS.

 

[Dave Pitman]

I am wondering what the Remote Controller 3 would give me in additional capabilities.

You must not have experience flying a multirotor with a standard remote, is that correct? The reason for my assumption is because if you have experience using a standard remote, then you probably wouldn't be asking your question. The motion controllers are fun and you have reasonable control. But the difference between the level of control compared to a standard remote is fairly significant.

So, if you don't have any experience with the standard remote, then it may feel un-intuitive compared to the motion that you're familiar with. But, for someone that is experienced with a standard remote, they will fly circles around you. If you are willing to put in the time to learn to use a standard remote, then yes, you should get it. IMHO.

If you're having fun with the motion and it meets your needs, then no need.

 

[PHZ]

You must not have experience flying a multirotor with a standard remote, is that correct? The reason for my assumption is because if you have experience using a standard remote, then you probably wouldn't be asking your question. The motion controllers are fun and you have reasonable control. But the difference between the level of control compared to a standard remote is fairly significant.

So, if you don't have any experience with the standard remote, then it may feel un-intuitive compared to the motion that you're familiar with. But, for someone that is experienced with a standard remote, they will fly circles around you. If you are willing to put in the time to learn to use a standard remote, then yes, you should get it. IMHO.

If you're having fun with the motion and it meets your needs, then no need.

Dave:
Thank you for your reply. I do have quite a bit of experience with two joystick controllers, both with dji drones, mini whoops, and rc fixed wing aircraft.
I assume that the Avata 2 and now the Neo 2 would fly more like a mini whoop or other freestyle quad.
The thing that had me thinking is how the straight-down dive, like down a mountainside works. I guess I will just jump in and find out.
Again, thank you for taking your time to respond.
Phil

 

[Dave Pitman]

You're welcome. With your experience, you will enjoy having the option to use the standard remote. Consider that there is probably zero professional fpv style footage that was flown with a motion controller. A motion style controller that was fixed to something, like in the case of a manned aircraft, would be a different kettle of fish.