- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
- Messages
- 116
- Reactions
- 103
- Age
- 51
Likely only a matter of time.
Being as they are using it as a sales point, I don't think they will unless forced to. By then I could enjoy years of freedon from being under DJI's controlling thumb.Likely only a matter of time.
Operating distance of 16 miles? What the f...?
Sadly they don’t sell the Evo’s in the UK because of the regs and I doubt this will either with an even stronger radio transmission.
i’d be selling my mp if they did.
Likely only a matter of time.
the flight distance of 16 miles... if that’s distance from the controller I don’t understand since from a height of 5’ the horizon is QUOTE]It's not. I believe it's 4.3 km.
I have only seen one guesstimate at $1500.00. Seems a little low maybe...price point ?
The Evo 1 camera with a tiny 1/2.3" sensor, a fixed-focus lens and no controllable aperture is better than the M2P camera with a 1" sensor and at least as good as the P4 pro?
Or it could be that the 586 gimbal camera is nowhere near as good as you imagine from the sparse information that's been published.The Evo 2 with 8k res is going to be ridiculously good for surveillance, SAR, and just plain having fun.
Your Evo 2 could be 400 feet high, completely unnoticed, and with even lossy digital zoom, you'll be able to identify people and small objects on the ground in great detail.
I suspect the frequency has much to do with it as well.Likely only a matter of time.
the flight distance of 16 miles... if that’s distance from the controller I don’t understand since from a height of 5’ the horizon is <3 miles away and from 100’ it’s about 12 miles... guess it’s just stronger signal or better antennae.
Started to watch the video, but the language used stops me from continuing. Probably a good video, but don’t they realize children watch these videos. I don’t get it.The Evo 1 is already better than the camera on the M2P, and at least as good as the P4P.
I just bought the M2P over the Evo 1, but only because of the superior tracking and signal strength, and the slight edge in night time camera quality is a cherry on top.
But if I was just going for overall camera quality, I would have gone with the Evo 1.
If the Mavic 3 is going to dominate the Evo 2, it's going to have to be based on superior tracking. Autel is almost definitely going to have better camera tech going forward.
I've even come to think that the Evo 1's zoom features are more useful than the Mavic 2 Zoom for search and rescue. Sure the Evo's zoom is digital and full of image loss, but for search and rescue and security and some inspections, what matters is being able go get as much detail as possible on your little cell phone, tablet, or other monitor.
The Evo 1's ability to zoom in 8x is situationally more useful than the M2Zoom's lossless 4x zoom.
The Evo 2 with 8k res is going to be ridiculously good for surveillance, SAR, and just plain having fun. Your Evo 2 could be 400 feet high, completely unnoticed, and with even lossy digital zoom, you'll be able to identify people and small objects on the ground in great detail.
Here's what the Evo 1 is already capable of. Now double that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.