I was not involved in this incident.@cyeung was there LE involved to make a report or are you just dealing with this guy one on one ?
I was not involved in this incident.@cyeung was there LE involved to make a report or are you just dealing with this guy one on one ?
Press for settlement and let the drone pilot or his dad worry about getting reimbursed from the ins company.No LE involved. I made sure to get 3 witness names and numbers from the scene. A 19 year old was piloting the drone. His father was also at the car show with him so that’s mostly who I’ve been dealing with, in addition to his insurance company which informed me today they have no liability. Both the drone owner and I are still trying to right with his insurance, so we will see what comes of that.
I know. It was a car show I know you wished you had missed now.I was not involved in this incident.
@glamb56 is the one with the damaged Range Rover. I have a humble and not exactly car show-worthy Chevrolet Volt.I know. It was a car show I know you wished you had missed now.
That kid should have known better as his father letting him fly there.
Please don’t think though all drone pilots are that stupid.
Some yes but more than I like to think.
Me either. Um, wasn't `t me.I was not involved in this incident.
You go after him in civilian court, guarentee he'll settle, plus if his drone is registered, go after his certification. The next question was he really in class B airspace? Don't speculate he was operating in Class B. Maybe your car show was 15NM out from the surface and the shelf was at 4k? And he was completely legal to fly. I've never heard of car shows being held under Class B airspace from the surface
Looks legal to me
It's legal if they got the authorizationI believe the red 400’ is the ceiling marker stipulating that LAANC authorization for drones can only be given up to 400’. Everything I have researched online says in class B air space, authorization is required before flying. I suppose I will find out pretty quickly if I end up having to contact the FAA. Appreciate the input.
View attachment 114110View attachment 114111
Initially tried to go through the drone owner’s home insurance, but they have denied any and all liability because the owner didn’t operate the drone in a “negligent manner”, as it seems the drone simply malfunctioned.
Just curious where is the drone now? I would ask for a duplicate of the video card and any and all flight recordings which may allow you to reconstruct exactly how this occurred. You should ask for it now in writing. You want to saddle pilot with duty to preserve evidence asap. May not be worth the bother in minor damage case but with special custom car? That pilot and his insurance carrier should be working hard to make you happy and restore that vehicle to perfection. Good luck I hope that good sense prevails and your car is restored promptly.
If not, go after civil. Did it have a registration number on it?
It should have been in plain view like a large serial number. If you didn't see it , it may or may not have been registered, at this point your looking at a lose unless you have their infoNot sure. I was too pissed in the moment to look closely at the drone. All I have is the picture I snapped of it that I attached in my first post. The guy picked it up pretty quickly after it crashed. Where is the registration number typically located?
I am perplexed by the denial of coverage by the HO insurance carrier. I have an HO4 policy (common form of HO insurance) and my drone is covered. I also have AMA insurance. If ones lawnmower suffers a mechanical failure and is then the cause of an accident, ones HO insurance provides coverage. If the mechanical failure is the result of a failure related to the manufacture of the lawnmower, then ones insurance company has the option of seeking a remedy from thr manufacturer. (subrogation)
I suspect that if one is licensed under 107 that the HO insurance company may decline coverage because they will assert that the drone operation was for business purposes. IMO, one should challenge the drone operator’s insurance company and remind it of the consequences of bad faith conduct.
Finally, the FAA is a law enforcement agency and cannot recover damages.
My home owners insurance absolutely stated they will not cover me during part 107I am perplexed by the denial of coverage by the HO insurance carrier. I have an HO4 policy (common form of HO insurance) and my drone is covered. I also have AMA insurance. If ones lawnmower suffers a mechanical failure and is then the cause of an accident, ones HO insurance provides coverage. If the mechanical failure is the result of a failure related to the manufacture of the lawnmower, then ones insurance company has the option of seeking a remedy from thr manufacturer. (subrogation)
I suspect that if one is licensed under 107 that the HO insurance company may decline coverage because they will assert that the drone operation was for business purposes. IMO, one should challenge the drone operator’s insurance company and remind it of the consequences of bad faith conduct.
Finally, the FAA is a law enforcement agency and cannot recover damages.
It should have been in plain view like a large serial number. If you didn't see it , it may or may not have been registered, at this point your looking at a lose unless you have their info
You should have kept that drone. They left the scene of an accident... try that routeI was also quite surprised they denied any liability for damages. I have a call scheduled with their claims manager tomorrow to get some more info on the denial and hopefully reverse their decision if I can prove the drone was not legally operated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.