I've never seen DJI release a teaser just for a filterI was thinking these were filters of some kind, Vivid , classic, ect but I hope your right.
Phantomrain.org
gear to fly your Mavic 3 in the Rain.
The subject line in the email was "Get ready for a Classic"I was thinking these were filters of some kind, Vivid , classic, ect but I hope your right.
I was thinking these were filters of some kind, Vivid , classic, ect but I hope your right.
Phantomrain.org
gear to fly your Mavic 3 in the Rain.
Yep confirmation that everyone that bought the Mavic 3, Mavic 3 Cine and the Pro Controller were SCREWED!!!
I think there will be a few people that disagreeYep confirmation that everyone that bought the Mavic 3, Mavic 3 Cine and the Pro Controller were SCREWED!!!
Even so that lens cost you $700I think there will be a few people that disagree
Ive noticed a fair few people really do use the tele photo lens now
How so?Yep confirmation that everyone that bought the Mavic 3, Mavic 3 Cine and the Pro Controller were SCREWED!!!
SDK is guaranteed to be available for the Mavic 3 before the Mavic 3 Classic. It takes around 12 months after release to write it. Classic is highly unlikely to be $700 cheaper, unless still sold with the crippled RC-N1, or without any RC. It will most likely have the $200 more expensive RC than the Mavic 3's RC-N1, which is the DJI RC, to offset the missing 7x telephoto camera. Mavic 3 is already only $2050, $150 cheaper than the $2200 it was at release. I'm guessing Classic at $1350-$1550, depending upon the included RC, and around $2000 for the Fly More version with the cheaper DJI RC. Add $1200 more for the superior RC Pro. We'll see on Nov. 2.If the price is $700 less for an identical drone without the tele-thingy, I'd say the original M3 really needs some additional functionality. Like SDK etc. I'd understand a difference of $100 tops. $700 for that thingy? No.
i would guess it to be 500 to 600 less tops ,but not 700 less.If the price is $700 less for an identical drone without the tele-thingy, I'd say the original M3 really needs some additional functionality. Like SDK etc. I'd understand a difference of $100 tops. $700 for that thingy? No.
I think the classic is more to try and get those Mavic 2 owners to spend some money by buying the M3 ClassicHow so?
The Classic is an alternative entry level Air 2S upgrade without the superior RC Pro controller nor the 7x telephoto, which is a game changer. It will most likely come bundled with the new dumbed down $309 DJI RC, so any savings from what the 7x telephoto costs on the Mavic 3 will be offset by a $200 increase in the included RC cost over the RC-N1. We shall see.
As a Mavic 2 owner, who bought both the M2P and the M2Z totaling $3,000, each with their own different strengths, the upgrade to the Mavic 3 for $3000 was a no brainer, for the 50% increase in flight time, and the 7x telephoto, all in one single drone. However, even the solo M2P purchasers spent $1700 at release for the basic kit. Upgrading a three year old M2P to the Mavic 3 for $2050 doesn't seem like that much of a stretch, especially if they want 10 more minutes of flight time, and also yearned for a telephoto M2Z camera, but didn’t spend the money 3 years ago to get one.
Agreed!How so?
The Classic is an alternative entry level Air 2S upgrade without the superior RC Pro controller nor the 7x telephoto, which is a game changer. It will most likely come bundled with the new dumbed down $309 DJI RC, so any savings from what the 7x telephoto costs on the Mavic 3 will be offset by a $200 increase in the included RC cost over the RC-N1. We shall see.
“Classic” By its definition, a standard, model, guide. I think that’s a good clue. Changes? Exclude the apparent issues creating a resistance of sales of the M3 (which I’m guessing was not expected…). Inclusions have me very interested and stumped a bit
After selling my Phantoms I have settled on Mavic 2 Pro as my workhorse drone. But like most other drones I feel the wideangle lens can be limiting in many situations, often I need a narrower field of view.However, if they have no interest whatsoever in the 7x telephoto (likely because they never tried the M2Z to see how effective even 2x to 4x can be, and don't understand the viewer impact of optical telephoto perspective changes),
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.