No more news?
There really isn't anything left to leak except the announcement date and a few minor details in the specs.
You mean ALL of the specs surely.
There is no information what-so-ever about the actual technical aspects of the camera, the exact obstacle avoidance makeup, any potentially new intelligent modes or anything else.
All that's leaked are the models. Nothing else.
No, I don't mean ALL the specs - DJI themselves have confirmed many major points so already that statement is not true.
We know for sure:
Sensor size (probably the single largest point of interest for most people, at least based on everything I have seen so far). We know the size. We dont know the technology the manufacturer, the dynamic range, the noise levels or anything else. Size is meaningless on its own.
Camera specification (the 1" model will be between 24 and 28mm and almost certainly F2.8 if you look at the housing - if you know the sensor size, an optical formula has minimum requirements for front element size)
We know nothing about the bit rate, the codecs used or any of the other important parts. The non zoom will likely be a f/2.2 (mavic is) or f/2.8 (air) but thats about it and again means nothing without the other parts.
Will it have a fixed or variable aperture?
The drone size
No details given on it
Flight autonomy/Active Track 2.0
OK so what is active track 2? What new features does it have? What are the differences to v1?
Omnidirectional obstacle avoidance
APAS
Infrared or visual or ultrasonic? How far to they work. Plenty of unknowns.
So we dont actually know ANYTHING thats needed to assess how useful or how much of an improvement any model will be.
Minor details such as any information at all regarding the specs of the camera for example? Those are fairly important "minor details".
You seem overly focussed on the 1" sensor. That alone is meaningless. There are some truly mediocre 1" sensors out there.
4k/60fps/100mbps bit rate also tells us nothing. H264? HEVC? H265? Theres a vast difference in quality between that look. Its decisions like that which decided whether a device is worth buying.
Currently there is no information at all about the cameras which can help to see if its significantly better or not.
All we know is the absolute bare bones. The different models and headline specs. Absolutely no details over that.
that is the only point I am making. For a third time, I am agreeing that smaller details like codecs will remain unknown until launch. Those types of details, while important to some, are not make-or-break for the overwhelming majority of hobbyist customers and many of them are easy to predict with a reasonable degree of certainty based on DJI's past as well as industry standards. They are also not the types of details that typically show up in leaks and rumors.
I don't think you understand certain aspects of video if you think 4k/60fps/100Mbps tell us literally "nothing". Each of those on their own are something, at the very least.
even the Mavic Air is significantly better and it shares the same sensor size of the MP.
Do you think they are going to put a 1" sensor on that aircraft, and then cripple it so badly that it performs worse than the original MP which is already below the Air in image quality? You can't possibly believe that.
People who milk to the point of making a worthless blabbing video just to give a freaking date drive me crazy.
This article states we'll have 100 mbit/s along with 4K@60 fps. I'm pretty sure it's close to be truth.
"What codec" doesn't mean anything either since with the "same" codec and bitrate many cameras give better video than the MP (including the MA).
Was never a codec issue, but a processing one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.