It may sound silly but worth a try.
Some ignorants, unaware of consequences started this long time ago calling flying multirotor - the drone.
Until then, per my knowledge this term was reserved for one purpose only - military equipment, armed and lethal. At first it was interesting and exciting to have control over something that evolved from "restricted area" to civilian use. But soon it became perceived as threat, by people mislead with that name. Privacy issue, tool for terrorists, etc. Privacy - we all know the reality. Terrorists can use anything to do harm so it is also endless subject. It is hard to explain now that this new technology is meant to be friendly. And I know, anything can be dangerous in wrong hands. Cars, alcohol, drugs, electricity, knives, heavy equipment kills people every day. How legislature controls those "deadly objects"?
My point is: stop using term "The Drone" while talking about our birds. Someone in power, who's voice will be wide spread and heard, should suggest separation for two types UAVs.
First Type: The Drone - Only for Military, PD and FD, Government, Commercial or simply non-civilian use.
Second Type: The Quad, MultiRotor, Multicopter for civilian area.
What do you think? Maybe you have different and possibly better suggestion how to call our birds...
Just my two cents.
Some ignorants, unaware of consequences started this long time ago calling flying multirotor - the drone.
Until then, per my knowledge this term was reserved for one purpose only - military equipment, armed and lethal. At first it was interesting and exciting to have control over something that evolved from "restricted area" to civilian use. But soon it became perceived as threat, by people mislead with that name. Privacy issue, tool for terrorists, etc. Privacy - we all know the reality. Terrorists can use anything to do harm so it is also endless subject. It is hard to explain now that this new technology is meant to be friendly. And I know, anything can be dangerous in wrong hands. Cars, alcohol, drugs, electricity, knives, heavy equipment kills people every day. How legislature controls those "deadly objects"?
My point is: stop using term "The Drone" while talking about our birds. Someone in power, who's voice will be wide spread and heard, should suggest separation for two types UAVs.
First Type: The Drone - Only for Military, PD and FD, Government, Commercial or simply non-civilian use.
Second Type: The Quad, MultiRotor, Multicopter for civilian area.
What do you think? Maybe you have different and possibly better suggestion how to call our birds...
Just my two cents.