- Joined
- Oct 12, 2016
- Messages
- 28,336
- Reactions
- 31,211
- Location
- Harrisburg, PA (US)
- Site
- mavichelp.com
Ash is just pointing out the facts (per the usual). His channel is a good source of factual drone news (and other things).Not sure what droning on's incentive is
I replied to his email and he replied back. He kept insisting that OsitaLV was more right than wrong (even though everyone knows this is not true). I also pointed out that another one of his "sources"... the one who actually "leaked" the spec sheet... gave proof that it was a spec sheet by offering a link. That link went to DJI's website advertising the Mavic Pro, Mavic 2 and Mavic Air. Clearly _nothing_ to do with that was mentioned. But he still kept insisting that they had a "source".So maybe, just maybe, this should be posted in the correct section - ‘News’.
Even rumor sells nowadays and creates excitment and readership which causes eyes to glance at ads.I replied to his email and he replied back. He kept insisting that OsitaLV was more right than wrong (even though everyone knows this is not true). I also pointed out that another one of his "sources"... the one who actually "leaked" the spec sheet... gave proof that it was a spec sheet by offering a link. That link went to DJI's website advertising the Mavic Pro, Mavic 2 and Mavic Air. Clearly _nothing_ to do with that was mentioned. But he still kept insisting that they had a "source".
Here is the thing... if you have a "source" from DJI, why would you include bogus "sources" and bogus links in your article? Clearly they are simply regurgitating made up crap that they found on the Internet and presenting it as fact.