Hey, they could charge admission. Pier Excursions®That pier takes off and moves to a different spot if the fish aren't biting there
Hey, they could charge admission. Pier Excursions®That pier takes off and moves to a different spot if the fish aren't biting there
and given the chop. Ohh dear lol.I think the kid was judged by a jury of his piers.
There's no minimum age to take the TRUST test. That's a bit uncomfortable. But then again, there are a lot of childish adults flying drones and the overall safety record is still very good.I thought that minimum age to fly was 16...
too bad such a young kid is going to be in so much trouble, when fully grown adults do stuff like this and don't get caught.
good callThat’s an awful piece of spelling
Agreed. Those are teenagers being teenagers and even with those kind of [serious] charges, my guess is hours of community service will be the outcome based on a plea where they'll resort to picking up at and cleaning the beaches for the entire summer. I can see the DA doing the calculations, two days a week, 13 weeks of summer......200 hours.If they can afford that boat (oh, and that house), one would think they could afford the trash pick-up service...
The nice thing about the Phantoms was the landing gear, which functioned better as catch handles than landing gear. The negative thing was the fixed prop blades were unforgiving.With a phantom and a leg catch it tends to be the thumb that is at risk.
You're asking a lot hereFrom the opening sentence of the news article, ".... was injured by the propeller blades of a fishing pier in".....
Blimey, the pier must have some motors.
I do wish news organisations would proof read their copy
Agreed and it hurt lol but my I dare say that a strike from a grown up magic prop would hurt too.The negative thing was the fixed prop blades were unforgiving.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.