Since it's nearly impossible for people to legally fly Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), does the OcuSync range provide any additional benefit over Wifi?
The hypothetical, if there were two identical drones, but the cheaper option only had WiFi connection instead of OcuSync, would paying more for OcuSync provide any benefit since OcuSync's range couldn't legally be utilized.
I ask because, without comparing other aspects of a drone, I'm trying to determine if I should consider OcuSync a benefit even though I'm not going to be flying it BVLOS.
For those wondering, don't laugh at me, I'm trying to figure out if I should buy the old Parrot Anafi vs. the Mini 2. I like the 180° gimbal on the Anafi but concerned about the quality issues I've read about. As for the Mini 2, I like the form factor and the seemingly more refined production but HATE the idea of geo-fencing on the Mini-2.
Anyone's thoughts, experience, comments are GREATLY appreciated.
The hypothetical, if there were two identical drones, but the cheaper option only had WiFi connection instead of OcuSync, would paying more for OcuSync provide any benefit since OcuSync's range couldn't legally be utilized.
I ask because, without comparing other aspects of a drone, I'm trying to determine if I should consider OcuSync a benefit even though I'm not going to be flying it BVLOS.
For those wondering, don't laugh at me, I'm trying to figure out if I should buy the old Parrot Anafi vs. the Mini 2. I like the 180° gimbal on the Anafi but concerned about the quality issues I've read about. As for the Mini 2, I like the form factor and the seemingly more refined production but HATE the idea of geo-fencing on the Mini-2.
Anyone's thoughts, experience, comments are GREATLY appreciated.