Image quality on the 28mm lens looks insane

[AroundTheWorld]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

However when watching the video on a 4K screen I still notice a huge gap in image quality between the 28 mm and the 70 /168 mm lenses as opposed to what people said

 

[Mrprop365]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

However when watching the video on a 4K screen I still notice a huge gap in image quality between the 28 mm and the 70 /168 mm lenses as opposed to what people said

very very nice. the dynamic range is mind blowing!

 

[Thg]

Sure, there is a quality difference between 28 mm, 70 mm and 168 mm lenses, I can see it in the very first tests I did with my Mavic 4. However, 70 mm is very usable, 168 mm is ok with some editing. But, what bothers me is the quite poor AF and AF tracking with those focal lengths.

 

[Meta4]

I still notice a huge gap in image quality between the 28 mm and the 70 /168 mm lenses as opposed to what people said

The long tele isn't too bad.

 

[UAVquadman]

The long tele isn't too bad.

I just get close in with my drone instead as this was shot at 22mm.

 

[Kilrah]

I just get close in with my drone instead as this was shot at 22mm.

And results in a completely different kind of shot as you'd expect.

 

[UAVquadman]

And results in a completely different kind of shot as you'd expect.

the background you are right.

 

[wco81]

Sure, there is a quality difference between 28 mm, 70 mm and 168 mm lenses, I can see it in the very first tests I did with my Mavic 4. However, 70 mm is very usable, 168 mm is ok with some editing. But, what bothers me is the quite poor AF and AF tracking with those focal lengths.

Hope that DJI comes out with a Mavic 4 Classic, with just the main camera, to reduce the weight and cost.

Put out a C1-compliant Mavic 4 that way.

 

[AroundTheWorld]

Hope that DJI comes out with a Mavic 4 Classic, with just the main camera, to reduce the weight and cost.

Put out a C1-compliant Mavic 4 that way.

I hope so too but the Mavic 4 Pro needs to loose 163 grams. That seems quite a lot and probably means to redesign a new gimbal And / Or reduce the battery capacity)

 

[Meta4]

Hope that DJI comes out with a Mavic 4 Classic, with just the main camera, to reduce the weight and cost.
Put out a C1-compliant Mavic 4 that way.

I hope so too but the Mavic 4 Pro needs to loose 163 grams. That seems quite a lot and probably means to redesign a new gimbal And / Or reduce the battery capacity)

Dropping the two tele cameras or reducing the battery won't save that much weight as explained in these two posts.

M

Post in thread 'DJI Mavic 4 Pro officially introduced'

Tuesday at 8:30 PM

I would consider a Mavic 4 Classic if it came out next year without the tele cameras and it fit under 900 grams.

For a Mavic 4 without the tele cameras to come in under 900g, it would have to lose 164 grams.
The difference in weight between the Mavic 3 classic and the Mavic 3 pro is only 53 grams.
So even if DJI released a Mavic 4 with only the main camera, it's not going to be <900g.

• Meta4

• 

M

Post in thread 'DJI Mavic 4 Pro officially introduced'

Tuesday at 9:07 PM

They'd probably have to remove that giant gimbal, maybe reduce the size of the aircraft and use smaller batteries, so you get only 43 or 44 minutes of flight time.

It's not realistic to expect that DJI would do a full remodeling of the whole drone to produce an economy model.
And the batteries for the 4 are listed as only 3g heavier so there's not much to gain there.

• Meta4

• 

 

[UAVquadman]

Dropping the two tele cameras or reducing the battery won't save that much weight as explained in these two posts.

M

Post in thread 'DJI Mavic 4 Pro officially introduced'

Tuesday at 8:30 PM

I would consider a Mavic 4 Classic if it came out next year without the tele cameras and it fit under 900 grams.

For a Mavic 4 without the tele cameras to come in under 900g, it would have to lose 164 grams.
The difference in weight between the Mavic 3 classic and the Mavic 3 pro is only 53 grams.
So even if DJI released a Mavic 4 with only the main camera, it's not going to be <900g.

• Meta4

• 

M

Post in thread 'DJI Mavic 4 Pro officially introduced'

Tuesday at 9:07 PM

They'd probably have to remove that giant gimbal, maybe reduce the size of the aircraft and use smaller batteries, so you get only 43 or 44 minutes of flight time.

It's not realistic to expect that DJI would do a full remodeling of the whole drone to produce an economy model.
And the batteries for the 4 are listed as only 3g heavier so there's not much to gain there.

• Meta4

• 

you tell it like it is! very good.

 

[wco81]

They should take the Mavic 3 Classic, update the camera and the internal electronics to support O4, add lidar, done!

 

[Dave Pitman]

The long tele isn't too bad.

Nice contrast of sailing vessels. Pun intended!

 

[UAVquadman]

Nice contrast of sailing vessels. Pun intended!

166mm Telephoto Mavic 3 Pro shot a few days ago, that's Boston in the background.