I use FlightRadar24 but it's more "entertainment" than anything else.
This next part is for ANYONE who uses or is interested in FlightRadar24 or Flight Aware . . .
- Do you realize the limitations of FlightRadar24?
- Do you have any idea what the Geography is there this took place? (hint tall mountains)
While I do believe it's gotten better over the last year or so, the last time I did a Deep Dive the Flight Apps (FlightRadar24 and FlightAware both use the same data etc) not only had huge GAPS in coverage but they also have potential lags of up to a few minutes. Also take into account that ADS-B isn't required to be operational in the Class GOLF airspace I operate in. Relying on an App is risky at best and downright crazy in my area.
Let's dive a bit deeper into FlightRadar24 (I just picked it because I use it):
"
Our estimations show that roughly 70% of all commercial passenger aircraft (80% in Europe, 60% in the US) are equipped with an ADS-B transponder. For general aviation this number is probably below 20%."
That's COMMERCIAL aircraft.
ADS-B isn't required outside of Controlled airspace so that opens another big HOLE in this theory.
Now keep in mind this does NOT allow for Geographical issues such as mountains creating Radar Blind Spots. It happens that I am in the heart of such a spot. We are "Below the radar" until we get within about 10 miles of KAVL and above 5,000' AGL.
Now don't forget about the other "feeder" for these Aviation Tracking sites called MLAT (Multilateration) which helps to fill in the blanks in SOME areas. Here's the caveat for MLAT....
"
MLAT coverage can only be achieved above about 3,000-10,000 feet as the probability that four or more receivers can receive the transponder signal increases with increased altitude"
Since we are operating below 1,000'AGL and inside of a mountainous "basin" we are 100% blind to radar and other ADS-B Rx devices.
I say all of this for TWO reasons:
- 1) So that others who think FlightRadar24 is the safest way to know if any Manned Aircraft are approaching can read and understand it's literally Flying Blind.
- 2) To demonstrate that the aircraft in question was well below any Flight Tracking what-so-ever.
I spent over an hour today on the phone with the FAA trying to find the aircraft in question (after they reviewed my video and agreed) but to no end. Without the N# (we can't determine it from the video due to the fact it flew overhead and the sun's angels we have no way to contact the operator). Initially I thought it was our local Tour Heli but after reaching out to them their aircraft has been down for Maintenance since last week. We are at a loss at this point.
Anyway, thank you ALL for watching and adding your input. It's all greatly appreciated.
Allen