Based on what I've read, I don't see what dirkclod suggested ("I take pictures all the time as a hobby flier of freinds houses and they blow em up and fame them. Is a good gesture to") as 'flying for business, a commercial enterprise, non-profit work, or for educational purposes'.
To be clear, I wasn't making any comment on the act dirkclod mentioned. It was more a general comment. If geared towards anythingmaybe the statement that you can take pictures "as long as you don't charge" as charging is probably not the defining element.
The text you have " 'flying for business, a commercial enterprise, non-profit work, or for educational purposes" is not the legal definition, although the FAA does use that in step 1 of their decision tree to see if you are a Part 107 flyer or not.
The law at this point simply says that "it is either "hobby or recreational use", or not. Leaves a lot of unknown. The FAA has clarified on a website with "
Recreational or hobby UAS or drone use is
flying for enjoyment and not for work, business purposes, or for compensation or hire. In the FAA's Interpretation of the
Special Rule for Model Aircraft, the FAA relied on the ordinary, dictionary definition of these terms."
Somewhere they clarified the dictionary definition for hobby as “a pursuit outside one’s regular occupation engaged in especially for relaxation” and “recreation” as “refreshment of strength and spirits after work, a means of refreshment or diversion.”
I am not lawyer but I would think the taking pictures of friends house and giving it to them certainly could be something you do for fun and would fall under recreational and not be part 107. On the the other hand, if I took a picture of a friends house so that he gave to the realtor to help sell the house, that is a little more grey. All I'm saying, making money isn't the sole differentiator. We've got a whole forum section on this site for these rules and regulations, so I won't clutter this post anymore with it.