For most people? Perhaps saying for MANY people might be more accurate. Everyone has their preferences. I just thought/think the extra weight and size was needless. As others have stated, the
MA2 controller is roughly the same size as he
Smart Controller. So, if DJI could pack so much more into the same size why did they go with such a large size and weight without any more features? The M2 controller weighing almost 3 ounces less at least has a display. FWIW, the
MA2/
MM2 controller weighs 388 grams while the the M2 controller weighs 315 grams a full 73 grams (2.6 ounces).
Here's another "feature" that I failed to mention. On the "smaller" controllers there are separate buttons for photos and videos. With the two buttons you don't have to look to make sure you toggle into the correct mode with a single switch. The right button took pictures, the left took videos. I found it took/takes far less cerebral attention. I know it's a simple matter of training and acclimatization to a different system, but the one button system makes it easier to be in the wrong mode. And, to switch modes you have to take one of your hands off the sticks. Perhaps not a big deal, but less convenient nonetheless.
I'm not sure why you want to bold and discuss the accuracy of my semantics. Most means the greatest number. By definition, with two choices, if more than 50% of the people prefer the new controller to the other, that is most . I even stated right within my post that you quoted, that my determination of "most" was not scientific, but was estimated from forum posts and posted reviews, where the vast majority (but definitely not all) seem to prefer the new one. If I wanted to be certain, I would need a real random selection poll or study, define the required confidence interval and then determine a sample size big enough to get an acceptable margin of error to be absolutely certain my statement is accurate. Since I have no interest in doing that, I'll stand by the statement that the anecdotal evidence we have certainly points to the fact that "most" (in other words, more than half) prefer the new controller. I've read or watched dozens of reviews on the
Mavic Air 2 controller, and for everyone that reviewed the remote, I can't think of one that stated the old one was better (at least since the very first reviews when we realized there is a pause function). I'm sure there are some reviews that stated that, but comparatively, very few.
When the drone was announced, there was a big thread right on this forum where the majority (most) of the posters were put-off by the size (from the pictures). Now that people have had it, it has flipped the other way. In this thread alone, you have 8 people who have stated a preference for the new one, one person who preferred the old one, 2 who like both the same (one depending upon flying with phone or tablet), and a couple who have never used it that made comments against the new one. So, basically out of real users 8 to 1 in favor of the new controller in this thread. Again, that's not enough data to represent everyone, but as I said, the evidence we have points to "most" preferring the new one.
As for the size, I've already posted in this thread that it is NOT the same size as the
Smart Controller. The new controller is much closer in size to the old one then it is to the
Smart Controller. I own all 3. I've measured all 3. I've used all 3. That said, the
Smart Controller still fits in my Flymore bag, so even though still bigger, it's small enough for me.
All that said, even though I like the new one better, there are a couple of things I like about the old one better. I could fit an Ipad mini without an adapter, the buttons you mentioned for filming, plus in a panic, I think the separate pause button is still a benefit for people instead of remembering to tap RTH. Those things don't outweigh my feelings the other way, but there are advantages each way.