I have been flying Typhoon H's and for the last year and a half a Typhoon H Plus. The H Plus has a fantastic camera but has limitations in it's use, (no aperture control, little to no time-lapse capability, very large and bulky . . . etc) I wanted to get a compact system with a camera that was on par with a C23 but I also wanted a proven system. These days everything is 'Pie in the Sky' on the front end, and it is not until they've been out a while that we get to see what is what.
I spent several months debating between the same choices as the OP and when I got right down to it, the EVO II (small sensor) seems to me; to be a gimmick, and some of the video I have viewed seem to bare that out. But beyond that, even if the camera is as good as the MP2 - what do we know about it operationally? And the Mavic 3? Same thing.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. The Mavic 2 Pro (to me) is the bird in the hand - it is a known system, with a great little camera, solid connectivity and its small and portable. I picked mine up a couple weeks back and am confident now that it was the right choice. If the Mavic 3 and/or the Evo 2 comes out tomorrow, I will still feel the same way.
I spent several months debating between the same choices as the OP and when I got right down to it, the EVO II (small sensor) seems to me; to be a gimmick, and some of the video I have viewed seem to bare that out. But beyond that, even if the camera is as good as the MP2 - what do we know about it operationally? And the Mavic 3? Same thing.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. The Mavic 2 Pro (to me) is the bird in the hand - it is a known system, with a great little camera, solid connectivity and its small and portable. I picked mine up a couple weeks back and am confident now that it was the right choice. If the Mavic 3 and/or the Evo 2 comes out tomorrow, I will still feel the same way.