Me, too.
I just watched a one-hour public television program that incorporated aerial video of a nearby undeveloped island. It was stunning on a 50" television. National Geographic quality level. I tracked down the videographer and found out that he shot it all with a
Mini 2 with only minor post processing. If 2.7k video looks that good, I think the 4k and 5.4k on my
Air 2S are more than adequate for me. (I do realize that the
M3 has better low-light performance.)
The
M3's extended flight time would be nice for long hyperlapses, but not for most of my flights. 20 minutes of useful flight time is fine for most work, especially when honoring the VLOS requirement.
Variable aperture seemed like a great feature, but other than added convenience when stopping down to achieve motion blur in video, I don't see that it's a game changer for most drone work, since most shots are at a longer distance and depth of field control is seldom a factor.
The 7X optical zoom on the second camera sounded like a wonderful feature, but it's limited to auto exposure mode and the only variable zoom is digital. While the 28X digital zoom (aka cropping) is useful for looking around during a flight, it's not going to produce good photographs.
All the "coming in January" features on the
M3 are a disappointment. I'm guessing they rushed it to the market for Christmas and end-of-the-year sales. And that makes me wonder whether it's better to wait to see what software and hardware glitches show up in the early production runs.
I've asked myself what I could do with a
M3 if I had one right now that I couldn't do with the
Air 2S. I haven't come up with enough benefits to justify the higher cost, greater size and weight, and uncertainty about unreleased features and bugs.
But, like
@Droniac, I'm eager to hear about the experiences and thoughts of those who fly the
M3.