Also, I failed to see the need for a door over the battery compartment. Seems like it would just add unneeded weight.
They won’t care if Mavic owners don’t buy it- they want you to buy the more expensive bigger siblings.Big yawn at DJI. If this info is correct, I don't see anyone buying it who has already bought a Mavic or Air (or even a Phantom since the 3). Basically a _slight_ bump from the Spark.
I'm thinking they are trying a new method to keep batteries secure. Given the # of complaints I bet they'd like to nail this issue.And see I see it totally different. I think it’s closed due to water issues. The amount of money they will save due to us always putting in the drink is huge. Lol. Well I do think it’s a sealed unit.
Yeah, those motors will probably be fine under water.And see I see it totally different. I think it’s closed due to water issues. The amount of money they will save due to us always putting in the drink is huge. Lol. Well I do think it’s a sealed unit.
Here are some more photos of the Mavic Mini:
It's 245 under 250gI was hoping/dreaming it to be more than it is looking to be... if DJI could have skipped it in under 250g it would undeniably be a market sector dominator. Which is a large ask to be honest to keep a product sturdy and robust enough for public consumption.
It's neither. It's a brand new model. DJI is likely not trying to replace the Spark or the Mavic Air.But whether its a Spark 2 or Mavic air 2 in actual form and function is the debate.
That postulated price tag is meaningless.Looking at the postulated $400 price tag its going to be a basic model
Which we all know he/she has been wrong more times then right. Really, no one should be listening this this person but some industry people would rather drink the kool aid for readership.FWIW, that entire article was created from a tweet OsitaLV shared where he took a wild stab at the unknown specs.
Yep cause water hurts motors. It’s the electronic circuit board that’s the issue.but hey I understand not all can be understood in life. Was just a thought.Yeah, those motors will probably be fine under water.
Question is does it have occusync 2. It would be a waste if it didn’t
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.