No reason to be selling at a loss, when demand is still high, despite the grumbling of a vocal minority. The GNSS issue is fixed for most, and only affects those who need to launch without delay. For the rest, a few extra minutes isn't a serious problem. It has no affect after launch, and no impact on stills and video, which are the only measurable output that most care about.Mavic 3s. Rumors of even replacing the crippled tele camera sensor. I just can't wait to sell my M3 at a loss and help the exec's at DJI get a new Lambo! Warm and fuzzy, baby! It ranks right up there with not being able to replace a battery on a Macbook Air! Cue numerous other comparisons...
How did you measure "high"? You might want to tell DJI so they don't have to release a "3S".
How'd you figure "minority"?
Most?
Was there a poll I missed?
Most? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
For someone like yourself, who wants to throw the baby out with the bathwater over a minor GNSS issue, which has numerous workarounds, for those affected by it, and also concerned over immediacy of deployment, I wouldn't expect you to understand. You are in the vocal minority. Realistically, a few minute delay in deployment on the first flight of the day, if one is affected by it, is not a reason to reject the Mavic 3, even for professionals.
If you don't shoot static subjects, it's not a minor issue.
. I DID read about some rumors and they will irritate some folks but ... whatever. No worries. If you bought it cause it was good enough then...
I minor issue.for what the M3 costs it should be spot on period with no excuses.
You are also making a lot of assumptions and speaking for those who have no complaints! Not being complacent at all. Just enjoying what the drone is already capable of today, rather than nitpicking about one issue that has only annoyed me one time, and that I have been able to work around every other time, until the most recent fix solved it for me. It isn't a deal breaker for anyone who is interested in working around it, should it ever be an issue.
It isn't a separate battery just for GPS startups. It is any other battery that is at 96% charge that cannot be topped off to 100% charge for flight, without first doing something with it to deplete it below 95% so it can be topped off to 100% for a later flight that day. Using it for GPS startup is a perfect win-win! Long distance flyers have been doing this for every flight for years. Every second counts when maximizing flight time. Swapping batteries after the HP has been acquired is par for the course. It's the only way to launch with a 100% battery.
It is also being remedied in the next FW update. If it is a deal breaker for you, wait until it is confirmed that it is fixed for everyone. Simple solution.
Good enough and getting better with every update.Ouch! This was meant to be just a tongue in cheek chuckle
I don't want to get involved in a drawn out discussion about this.
Maybe it will ... I hope it does.
Thank you for the clarification. I now understand what you meant. Would I prefer it used Go 4 instead of DJI Fly? Certainly. Lots of goodies missing from GO 4. Complete agreement there! I am hoping some will eventually make their way back, and into the DJI Fly app, like the file number incrementing for one! The DJI Fly app is still better than anything Autel Robotics is putting out!
