DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

NTSC and PAL - any real difference?

PeteS2017

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
81
Reactions
21
Age
63
I've been shooting in NTSC because apparently it's the only way you can get 30fps.

Can anyone tell me if it gives inferior image quality to PAL, or can cause any other problems?
 
Those are old analog standards, they have no effect on the image other than the options for FPS.. shoot whatever works for you.
 
Most people will not be able to easily tell the difference between NTSC and PAL. The main difference starts with the electrical power system that runs behind the color transmissions. In the United States, electrical power is generated at 60 hertz. The signal behind the NTSC broadcast format is set to send out 60 fields per second. Most televisions use a interlaced system, so the NTSC signal sends out 30 lines of the image, followed by another 30 alternating lines. Basically, that results in 30 frames of a complete image appearing every single second.

In Europe and other countries, electrical power is generated at 50 hertz. Televisions that utilize PAL as the broadcast format only produce 25 frames of a complete image appearing every single second. This causes problems with the proper display of motion, as it makes actors move a bit faster because of the difference in frames per second that are showing movement. If you are trying to watch a PAL movie on a NTSC television, you need to add 5 frames per second, or the motion of the film will be very jerky or slow.



General rule of thumb, use NTSC if you are in the states, and PAL if you are in Europe.
 
Last edited:
Except this really only applies to analog transmission and is no longer relevant (unless you find a way for the Mavic to output analog video)... modern TVs are basically monitors, there's is absolutely no correlation between power (the decoder runs on DC) and video signal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gjhick
Except this really only applies to analog transmission and is no longer relevant (unless you find a way for the Mavic to output analog video)... modern TVs are basically monitors, there's is absolutely no correlation between power (the decoder runs on DC) and video signal.

If he is in the states, he wants to run NTSC, it has a faster frame rate and will give smoother video. If he lives outside of the states and runs NTSC, and films near street lights, electrical wire, he may get flickering in his video. So yes, analog or not, it does make a difference. There is no reason to run PAL with a 25 FPS here in the states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coop64
Except this really only applies to analog transmission and is no longer relevant
This is true and I mistakenly thought for a few years now that we were finally done once and for all with interlaced nonsense. So can someone explain why the Mavic camera records video at 29.97 fps? As far as I can tell it's not interlaced, but it's not true 30 fps either. (It always bothers me when devices show 24/30/60 fps when they really don't mean it.)
 
Strictly speaking, NTSC and PAL don’t exist in the world of HD video - they are SD standards. These days, those terms just shorthand for 25fps vs 30 fps (which is actually 29.97).

At a given bitrate, 25fps will have slightly better image quality and 29.97 will have slightly better motion rendition, but the difference is minor.



I've been shooting in NTSC because apparently it's the only way you can get 30fps.

Can anyone tell me if it gives inferior image quality to PAL, or can cause any other problems?
 

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
131,718
Messages
1,565,551
Members
160,567
Latest member
topcomons