Possible Answer to DJI sales in the US

[Dave Pitman]

The new era in US national security. Pay to Play.

It looks like the current regime is putting national security on the back burner with regard to China and technology so long as the company is willing to give the regime a cut.This could be the simple answer for DJI. A cut of 15% to the regime could grease the wheels and DJI is back in business.

Trump's unusual Nvidia deal raises new corporate and national security risks, lawmakers and experts say

The latest move risks creating a pay-for-play framework for the sale of sensitive technologies to U.S. adversaries, according to analysts and legal experts.

www.reuters.com

 

[GFields]

But sadly, that 15% will be paid by the consumer

 

[Dave Pitman]

But sadly, that 15% will be paid by the consumer

Folks are already paying more than 15% above retail for units from S. Korea and elsewhere. And then they don't get a warranty. Why not just pay a bribe up front and be able to purchase Care Refresh and receive warranty service?

 

[Cafguy]

If it were only that cut and dry......However the Government will site The following as a major reason DJI is being harassed.

Market Dominance and Supply Chain Risks: DJI's substantial market share (estimated at over 70% of the U.S. commercial drone market at one time) also raises concerns about U.S. reliance on a single foreign vendor, creating potential vulnerabilities in the supply chain. This is viewed as potentially stifling domestic drone manufacturing and weakening supply chains.

NOW we thinking people in the U.S. KNOW darn well that anything electronic manufactured here would have NO hope of competing with a much cheaper to produce version from China, The Government seems to be ignorant of this fact though.

 

[Dave Pitman]

.However the Government will site The following as a major reason DJI is being harassed.

True. But a couple of months ago, they said that selling the most powerful AI chips to China was a no-go. Yet a bribe is paid, and now it's acceptable.

Up until the regime took over in January, Tik Tok was to be banned with bi-partisan support and confirmation from the Supreme Court. Likely, a back-room deal was made, and that ban has fallen by the wayside.

When we consider that foreign policy is now for sale at a new level, all things are possible.

 

[Cafguy]

Likely, a back-room deal was made, and that ban has fallen by the wayside.

That is speculation at best.

Up until the regime took over in January,

I have lived in the U.S. my entire life I even worked as a soldier in the US Army. I have never seen a "regime" Elected to power in this country. The people you are after are the Anti-Drone effort and their army of lobbyists.
The biggest problem with this whole deal I.M.O. is :
While it is true that china should pay us more in tariffs to import their goods, Our elected president wants all the money NOW. Instead of using a reasonable and a sensible way for China and Companies in China to pay it !

 

[Dave Pitman]

That is speculation at best.

Agreed. This speculation is entirely based upon demonstrated transactional behavior. Curious what you would think has caused the complete turnaround?

I have lived in the U.S. my entire life I even worked as a soldier in the US Army. I have never seen a "regime" Elected to power in this country.

Again, Agree, Until now. My reason for saying that is until now, it was extremely rare for US federal workers, including law enforcement and military, to have to ignore their oath to the constitution in order to follow the orders of their superiors. Before now, when did you see federal law enforcement, not in an under cover setting, wearing masks and not willing to identify themselves? But that is another story.

While it is true that china should pay us more in tariffs to import their goods, Our elected president wants all the money NOW. Instead of using a reasonable and a sensible way for China and Companies in China to pay it !

I recently watched a tour of a Toyota factory in Texas. All of the manufacturing prowess that elevated Toyota to it's position in the world was on display...in Texas, with a US workforce. The solution to helping the US improve it's ability to get back to high level manufacturing par with China and others would seem to be by enticing them to bring that manufacturing experience here and sharing it with us. In fact; that is the strategy that China has been using for like 50 years now. And it has worked out well for them.

 

[Reginald E Johnson]

The new era in US national security. Pay to Play.

It looks like the current regime is putting national security on the back burner with regard to China and technology so long as the company is willing to give the regime a cut.This could be the simple answer for DJI. A cut of 15% to the regime could grease the wheels and DJI is back in business.

Trump's unusual Nvidia deal raises new corporate and national security risks, lawmakers and experts say

The latest move risks creating a pay-for-play framework for the sale of sensitive technologies to U.S. adversaries, according to analysts and legal experts.

www.reuters.com

Render unto Caesar!

 

[Cafguy]

It is impossible for the U.S. to compete with China in manufacturing and especially electronics production.
Our country must import the raw materials from too far away at a huge expense. China is centrally located on the globe and getting the raw materials there is easy.
If we want cheaper prices,, and judging by the business Walmart is doing...We do. Then we need to learn to compete in a new world market with our strengths. The FIRST thing that must happen is to get the Government off the backs of the American producer. Business here is much to regulated and its hard enough to turn a profit because of it.
Just because our government wants to throw China out there as a scapegoat without even mentioning themselves does not mean we all have to believe it.

 

[Macinfo]

Reuters could tell me water is wet and I would debate on whether to believe them...

 

[Dave Pitman]

Reuters could tell me water is wet and I would debate on whether to believe them...

Are you one of those that also wouldn't believe 99% of doctoral scientists?

 

[Macinfo]

Are you one of those that also wouldn't believe 99% of doctoral scientists?

May not that high, but there are number of them that don't know how anything works either..