FlyingFilmmaker
Well-Known Member
#1 Good point. Encoding from a lossy format to a lossless format you will technically lose some quality. Very likely not noticeable, but possibly visible. The "studio professional" solution is generally not to invent pixels (which is rarely a good idea, image quality wise) but to capture in a lossless format like Prores or DNxHR or RAW. Unfortunately, most drones/affordable cameras don't capture these formats and even if they did, they take a lot of space.#1 No it doesn't matter what you encode to, what bitrate you use. If you are re-encoding video then you lose quality..Period. Now you can apply filters and color grading and you may "perceive" you have a better video, but from a pure pixel/resolution perspective unless you using some really cool profession(studio professional) software that can literally "invent" pixels, you're degrading the picture.
#2 Yes it depends on you final target, but if that's the case why buy a drone that records 4K at 100+mb?
#3 Whatever works, just stating what works for me. I'm a novice in producing cinema and shooting with drones, but have been dealing with video encoding and filtering and editing for decades. I have a nice laptop, but resolve takes some horsepower to load a 20 min video, compared to a 5 min clip where as I can turn a 20min video into a 5 min clip in less than 5 min in avidemux.
#2 My reason for using a camera/drone that captures 4k or 10 bit or 150mbps is to have more data to work with in post so that I have freedom to crop more or push the grade farther etc. if I need to without it becoming noticeable in the final output.
#3 Again, good point. I usually am working with short (well under 1 min) clips (drone footage that is), so that's generally not something I'm running into. If that works well for you, that's great!