Burning Man Black Rock is scheduled for 8/28 to 9/4, so the TFR wouldn't be issued until July?When will the FAA issue a TFR. It's not on the site yet. There are currently no TFRs in Nevada at all.
Your point?15. If a pilot is acting in an unsafe manner either law enforcement or the Black Rock Rangers have the authority to confiscate the controller/transmitter and transfer it to the Safety Officer.
16. If a crashed craft is found it will be transferred to the Safety Officer.
17. Aircraft confiscated for flying unsafely, recklessly or in violation of rules will be held by the Safety Officer.
1) I think he should have read the fine print of the contract he entered (purchasing the ticket, reading the website, etc.,, it is VERY clear that drones are prohibited. But he either didn't, or chose to ignore the restrictions. So...Your point?
There's no argument about pilots "acting in an unsafe manner", crashed aircraft, or pilots "flying unsafely, or recklessly". Violating the rules? there's some question about what the legal, enforceable rules are.
What do you, @Torque, think should happen to an attendee that puts his Mini3P in the air, is informed by the guy in the tent next to him that drones are prohibited, immediately lands and puts it away? However one of the jackbooted volunteers saw it, grabs an Officer, and heads over to the offender.
What do you think should happen?
Now wonder, there are so many of my friends having second thoughts about purchasing a Drone. Sometimes the reaction to some posts is negatively overwhelming. It's like spitting in the air! Just remember that what goes up must come down and maybe right back onto your face as the Chinaman says.Just returned from AfrikaBurn. I am one of the Airspace Managers, for fixed wing, rotary wing and reluctantly function as the drone police. Just to let folks know, if they plan to attend any of the worldwide or US based Burning Man events there are specific rules, which prohibit any but our one or two permitted, possessing waivers, insurance and proper local licensing from FAA/CAA to film at the events. This year we started very aggressive policing of illegal drone flights. We captured 15 drones this year at AfrikaBurn alone, ranging from a Mavic 3 Pro to an assortment of 2's and minis. We do eventually give them back to the owners, but make it a colossal pain in the a$$ to teach them a lesson. A few argue with us, and I simply point out the nearby law enforcement officer, who lurks close by. Choice: we confiscate it, you eventually get it back, or face the local closed airspace, flight over large events, no commercial local license, no waiver and no insurance criminal violations. These charges will add up to many thousands in fines, many automatic, permanent loss of equipment and possible jail time. Depends on the local laws in that country.
We are in the process of buying the latest flight ID tracking devices, but we seem to be doing quite well with hand-talkies and eyeballs. What goes up must come down. So In next years events, we will be electronically logging and passing to local CAA, violators. It is a safety hazard to the participants and a violation of their right to privacy and a severe hazard to our medivac helicopters and fixed wing traffic. Spread the word, we would prefer not to have this as a primary job, but rather the occasional dufus to deal with.
Yeah,,,,seems totally NOT in line with the whole purpose of Burning Man, which is a hedonistic event.Let me be clear here.
I support this policy and the effort to enforce it 100%.
I am utterly opposed to you, and those with your attitude doing it.
You display a very hostile, punitive disposition about enforcing rules. You are exactly the kind of person that should never be an LEO, or associated with enforcement. It is this kind of attitude that leads to conflict, and sometimes violence.
I suspect the vast vast majority of people putting up a drone at the Burning Man event in NV really don't know any better, don't know the rules, and are happy to comply. Terrorism Laws? You're serious, aren't you?
Far better would be to simply confiscate the drone, then give it back at the end of the last day, while the violators enjoy the rest of the event. There's no need to heap addition pain and hardship on someone for making an innocent mistake. It an opportunity to educate, not punish.
Good. I find myself discouraging people who want to buy a drone far more than I encourage people to enter the hobby. Too many people feel they have the right to fly anywhere they want, regardless of the safety issues or laws. My right to have fun should never trump another's right to safety.Now wonder, there are so many of my friends having second thoughts about purchasing a Drone.
The question becomes - is there a TFR for Burning Man? If not, they have ZERO authority over air space!To me, after reading this entire thread it is becoming obvious that there are some folks who think laws and regulations are for suckers, and that they can do what they want, and break any rule they disagree with - using their own good judgement of course.
However, when these law breakers get caught, they seem to want to hold the ones that caught them; not only to a higher standard, but seem to feel that they (the law breakers), should be the ones determining what the outcome should be - again based on their own good judgement.
I don't know what Burning man is, and don't really care. It seems to me the OP has an affiliation with the event and provided a PSA to any potential drone pilots who were thinking of attending and flying a drone at BM, as to what the potential outcome would be, and gave examples of past occurrences and how they played out. The rules about drones at these events are crystal clear to anyone who cares to see.
Why would the FAA issue a TFR for an event that isn't scheduled until August 27th?The question becomes - is there a TFR for Burning Man? If not, they have ZERO authority over air space!
Exactly. And you can google past TFRs and NOTAMs for Burning Man. SMHWhy would the FAA issue a TFR for an event that isn't scheduled until August 27th?
The question becomes - is there a TFR for Burning Man? If not, they have ZERO authority over air space!
Let me help.I don't understand the reactions to this post. It seems to be an emotional topic for some. The rules are essentially the same as if I was caught flying my drone over one of our Seattle stadiums, a large parade, or an open air concert. However in those instances the consequences would most likely be far more expensive than just having my drone held for a few days.
A jailed traffic violator is analogous to a confiscated drone how?What you advocate is arresting and taking to jail someone caught going 68 in a 65mph zone.
That sort of treatment is for the guy going 105 weaving through traffic going 65.
When you purchase a ticket to a private event, it is an implied contract. I am not a lawyer so I suggest you goggle this topic.No contract is presented upon entry to BM that anyone signs. Most of the detailed rules for the event most of the attendees are blissfully unaware of.
Burning Man rules state that you must have Part 107 to apply to fly there. If you don't, give me your drone until you leave....We have no disagreement if someone is doing something dangerous or in violation of flying rules that, having been required to get a TRUST certificate.
Clarify please. Because I agree that violator's drones should be temporarily held until the pilot leaves the event you find me "unreasonable". Because I respect the rules they have implemented you find me unreasonable?There's nothing more complicated to my point than that. I've attended BM many times. LEOs at the event are far more reasonable than @Torque and the OP would like them to be. Thank God.
Hmmm... doesn't seem like you actually did read the thread.To me, after reading this entire thread it is becoming obvious that there are some folks who think laws and regulations are for suckers, and that they can do what they want, and break any rule they disagree with - using their own good judgement of course.
For Flying your drone at flying man you can expect the following :Let me help.
What you advocate is arresting and taking to jail someone caught going 68 in a 65mph zone.
That sort of treatment is for the guy going 105 weaving through traffic going 65.
I hope that illustrates the point I'm making. We have no disagreement if someone is doing something dangerous or in violation of flying rules that, having been required to get a TRUST certificate.
No contract is presented upon entry to BM that anyone signs. Most of the detailed rules for the event most of the attendees are blissfully unaware of.
The authorities at BM intend a safe, fun event, and that's what they're there to make happen. They have discretion, and for the most part they use it appropriately. That's why people who imbibe a bit too much are usually handed over to spouses or friends to go sleep it off, rather than ejected from the event, even though public intoxication is prohibited, and grounds for ejection.
On the other hand, people that get drunk and bother other people DO get kicked out.
There's nothing more complicated to my point than that. I've attended BM many times. LEOs at the event are far more reasonable than @Torque and the OP would like them to be. Thank God.
I fully expect to fly my CX-10WD, maybe be asked not to, and will be allowed to simply put it away and carry on with my fun at the event. We'll see.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.