Weird perceptions here. My Medivac was coming in at dusk for a patient, as I said unfortunately passed. Had the Helicopter hit one of the drones operating illegally there, it would have killed the crew. Our pad is only .5 kilometers from the event. So let us take the Billionaire and just the one real twit drone guy. Billionaire was trying to crash the event. The BM philosophy is nobody is any better than others. Don't go for the animal farm thing with others being more equal than others. No ticket, jump the gate. Hmm what is a fellow to do. He tried plenty of intimidation on us. We use the Ranger philosophy, swarm. However we stood firm, as did the attending Rangers and the Box office perimeter folks. It was my call ultimately as it was an airspace issue, with the ticket issue from box office weighing in.
The other one, yes intimidation. First off, we have a licensed drone operator for the event. That particular one, the one without lights, came and was flying around the legal drone, over large crowds, swooping in and out during the tree burn. So we found him, since it was not the first time he did it. We had him on video nearly colliding with the legal drone. We did only confiscate it, but he had to come back the day after the event to get it back. An action the event coordinator supported and endorsed, as she did with the ejection of the billionaire.
This is South Africa Folks, no FAA, they're CAA. Very strict rules, very big fines. The mentioned drone operator was German. He also illegally imported the drone to South Africa. Customs would have played hell with him had they found it. So our approach is to first confront with intent to confiscate, the German tried to leave the area with his drone. 5 rangers were there, aside from myself. LEO was off to the side. Ultimately yes, we had to intimidate since he was, perhaps a slightly stoned belligerent twit. Totally the guy I want operating a 3 lb brick (
Mavic 3 Pro) over large groups of people.
So what would all of your civil petting procedure have been? I am not going to let the person walk off with the drone just to do it again. I cannot touch him physically. If it comes to that I just let LEO there in South Africa toss them in their truck and off to the lockup. We are trying to educate drone operators to actually understand to not bring them in the first place. How do you get the folks to comply. I do spend the mornings strolling about with a lime green vest from airspace, which we hastily affixed a drone symbol to. The people that are decent caring folk come and talk to us and we go over it with them. The twits, never do. There are lots of signs. The folks doing this knew they were breaking the rules. If it gets to be a problem, there is CAA, which will be attending next year as we finish the full time airstrip then. They will not take the confiscate approach. They kind of want the money fines provide. Again, we got 15, with one real twit out of that group.
Just remember folks the rest of the world is not the USA. Your license is not valid anyplace but there. Your little toy sub 250 gram drone is violating the power output on the transmitter in that country if it originated in the USA. If you didn't declare it at customs you are also violating the law in many countries. If you should switch it on, you're violating other laws concerning radios and output. Everyplace is different. Flying is a privilege not a right. Break the rules and lose the privilege. Oh and our rules thing mentioned. Private land and airspace rights in different countries vary. In South Africa the land owner also has to sign the operators waiver to be over their land with a drone, yes totally within our right to enforce. Different rules than the USA folks. Some countries do not use English Common Law as the basis, they use Code Napoleon. A system where essentially you are guilty until you prove your innocence, not exactly but essentially that in practice. That means you go to jail then prove your innocence. You just don't want to go there, over a drone.