Think again - this time from a standpoint of probability. Which type of aircraft is more likely to fail mid-flight? The $1000 drone piloted by some dude or the helicopter, piloted by a serious professional usually with thousands of hours experience?
I really get a kick out of manned pilots patting themselves on the back.
I was a Naval Flight Engineer and flight instructor. Part of my role was training pilots as a team with the instructor pilots. I've done a complete 360 on the runway, because of pilot error. Ive seen (and repaired) more broken airplanes than I could begin to count, because of pilot error. I've seen a pilot punch the runway so hard that it drove a main strut through the wing, burning a 4 engine reconnaissance plane to ashes, again...pilot error. And lastly, I saw 50 of my shipmates explode in a ball of fire over the pacific. They never found all of the bodies. It too was pilot error.
This is likely less than .005% of the stupid things I've witnessed from pilots so get over yourselves. I've seen the side of you that you don't want anyone to see. There's a large percentage that barely squeaked through flight training and apparently one of them just used a helo as a weapon.
But as soon as a drone operator farts, OMG Activate the launch sequence… the sky is going to fall and commies have hopped the wire.
That is pretty funny. Sucks for the drone pilot, maybe next time they'll not fly over people.
I was near griffith park in LA (many signs stating the prohibition of drones at the actual observatory just FYI. All over the place like I've never seen.) And one of those firefighter planes which drop all of that flame retardant material (is that no longer PC? Sry, 'flame with an extra chromosome smothering material') and I'd judge the height above my drone to be at least 900 feet, but just coming close to it cause enough rf disruption for the drone to wobble wildly for a brief moment. I live not to far from a small airport and due to the tx's from communications I can't quite fly 1k out, yet some areas nearby I can go a few kilometers out at least (all I've cared to attempt) with all stock MPP.
This is well understood, I just mean to put an emphasis on the possibility that the helicoptor pilot who flew over it could have downed the drone at the surfing competition because of it's overwhelming transmissions. In any case, that pilot deserves a piece of his helicopter stuck to his dome if he intentionally did that. Luddite bastards. '**** that much more efficient, safe, and cost effective way of doing what I do!!!'
Think again - this time from a standpoint of probability. Which type of aircraft is more likely to fail mid-flight? The $1000 drone piloted by some dude or the helicopter, piloted by a serious professional usually with thousands of hours experience?
I purchased my first drone so I could drop
I've had touch the blades of my MPP twice. Once on top unmodded ascent and the propellers gave me a small cut on the side of my hand,.,.. that was done on purpose after I touched the propeller on accident to grab it right when it landed and suffered no damage at all. The tip of my finger hurt only slightly, far less than having a door closed on it. Unless those propellers hit an eye, then I imagine they're pretty harmless.
So yes, a large helicopter flying low above people is far more dangerous. Your point is moot even if drones have an infinitely higher chance of dropping out of the sky at any time - which they do not - think about it.
In this case at this low altitude there is no way the helicopter has time to initiate a safe landing. It just goes down like a brick before hitting the safe button...When a helicopter loses power the pilot still has a measure of control on the way down - it doesn't just plummet like a rock. When a drone loses power for example when the battery fails (and this happens more often than you would know) the thing plummets like a rock.
In this case at this low altitude there is no way the helicopter has time to initiate a safe landing. It just goes down like a brick before hitting the safe button...
Agreed @crystal-pete ... This is an example of all-round stupidity. But if the Helo' was filming surfers, then the last thing the pilot needs is a drone buzzing around that he's got to have eyes in the back of his head to track, while he's also tracking the surfer and while he's keeping altitude. It must have been so frustrating for the helo' pilot to know that the drone operator just didn't appreciate the work-load he/she was already under! I also find it amazing that the Mavic just hovered there while the chopper came over, and while things were thrown at it ... If the operator didn't have VLOS and the common sense to get the hell out of the way - then stupid as the whole event was, they shouldn't be flying a drone and the copter pilot actually did them a favour ...So why bother nitpicking about this particular case? I was obviously making my point in general terms. The fact still remains that the incident WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED had the irresponsible drone pilot not been flying illegally in the first instance.
All he/she needed to do was stay 30 metres away from the people in the water and the FAA would have one less example to use when justifying new and heavier restrictions that are more than likely to be handed down some time sooner than later.
Be 100% assured that I have thought about it - my point is far from moot. When a helicopter loses power the pilot still has a measure of control on the way down.
I don't understand that logic either. Given that the drone operates on a battery, it would have left on its own accord likely within a few minutes. Knocking it out of the sky because it was "flying over people" is a new level of stupid that displays a complete ignorance of gravity. One could say, second only to defending the action. I won't say that because it would be rude. But one could.Im not getting it. Somehow a potential 10,000 pound controlled crash of a helicopter is less of a danger than the potential 1 pound “plummet” of a Mavic? That is bad math. I don’t care how much more likely the mavic is to crash. You only need to move 4 inches to avoid it. Even if it heads right at you, chances are you can deflect it. The helicopter .... ummmm death. That maneuver was dumb by both pilots. The maneuver that posed the most risk was the helicopter pilots. To be honest how did the pilot know that flying like that wouldn’t cause the mavic to hit someone on the way down. Let alone flying 10,000 pounds over swimmers. No excuse for that.
Unbelievable - you actually believe the FAA’s should/would use that video to exemplify what not to do With DRONES!All he/she needed to do was stay 30 metres away from the people in the water and the FAA.
Its the equivalent of purposely crashing your car into someone else's for cutting you off in traffic.Unbelievable - you actually believe the FAA’s should/would use that video to exemplify what not to do With DRONES!
LOL - I am at a loss for words. You do realize that the FAA governs manned aircraft right. You know, the helicopter that was used to crash another aircraft. There absolutely has to be a law that prohibits that. In fact, I’m betting it is criminal to do it!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.