It sounds like you place the same confidence in your wildly enthusiastic better-than-anything claims about the Mini 3 Pro's performance as the rest of us do.
Why Mini 3 Pro beats Air2S 4K image quality
- Thread starter test2000Anafi
- Start date
It sounds like you place the same confidence in your wildly enthusiastic better-than-anything claims about the Mini 3 Pro's performance as the rest of us do.
izometric
Well-Known Member
izometric
Well-Known Member
Prepare to be severely disappointed. I just returned the Nano+. It is overrated and way too expensive for all the flaws it comes with.
Thanks for the specific number! Is it true that the amount of light that hits the mini 3 sensor is 310% more?
Wreckhunter
Well-Known Member
Good Greef the mini 3 pro is not even out yet,with no reviews,and now there are rumors that it may be postponed.
I can't see the camera being as good as the air2s when the results come in with reviews.Why should it be,as the air2s is
their midrange model.
EliteBleader
Well-Known Member
The sensor is the nano+ is probably more advanced.
Everybody claims that 3Pro cannot beat Air2S. Even though nano+ already beat it. The safe bet is to go with nano+ as I don’t think Air2S has good video quality, at all. Very muddy with details lacking in shadowy areas. I know 3 pro has much better out of the box image quality and I have not seen a direct comparison with nano+ but the low light of nano plus is on par with mavic 3
Everybody claims that 3Pro cannot beat Air2S. Even though nano+ already beat it. The safe bet is to go with nano+ as I don’t think Air2S has good video quality, at all. Very muddy with details lacking in shadowy areas. I know 3 pro has much better out of the box image quality and I have not seen a direct comparison with nano+ but the low light of nano plus is on par with mavic 3
YVRGUY
Well-Known Member
What fantastic timing. I’m one of the many old flying farts on Mavic Pilots. I fly both my Air 2S and Mini 2 with endless enjoyment. I’m not a photography expert, but, I do hold my ground just fine in that area. The results I get at the end of the day be it some photos or a couple of videos…still blows my mind
as to the incredible reproduction quality. I have a hard time trying to knock the latter. Today, I just returned from the hospital from the second of two cataract surgeries in the last 3 months (see pic)…it was my left eye today as you will note the super large aperture opening (pupil) in my left eye. With such a large opening in my left eye versus the right, both eyes with spanking new lenses…everything is truly focussing clearly now no matter what aperture …WOW what a difference. I was impressed with drone photography results before and now it’s amazing what I view.
So, as Meta4 said, “the quality of the resulting image depends on a lot more than just the aperture size.” … the lenses as well have a big contribution to quality, and I’m sure the sensors. But, right now with one huge pupil and one small, new lenses, no matter what the light…I see most clearly now.
Again, not the expert. There are so many angles of information on this very popular subject and I thank all of you for allowing me to hear your experiences and knowledge.
I’m in the basement playing with the cat with the lights out
…good low light visibility with this huge pupil. 
Wreckhunter
Well-Known Member
How could something that has not even been released yet,with no reviews,beat anything,lol.
Maybe it will ,and maybe it will not beat air2s camera quality.My money is on the later.
10 YouTube channels have about finalised their reviews I have no idea on the embargo lifts though it was supposed to end
I don't know that I agree. Specs on paper don't mean a lot. While we won't be able to do a side by side comparison until the Mini 3 is released, my professional photography experience doesn't think that the difference will be all that much. I've taken photos with my full frame cameras and those that had APS-C sensors (I think that's the size), imagines printed regularly up to 30x40" and virtually no difference in detail or image quality. Megapixel count was largely irrelevant. Granted, a wide angle lens, pulling detail from subjects at distance is a whole different thing, I have to believe that the only advantage that we might see with the Mini 3 are better low light images. The other thing is that while the camera specs with F1.7 and larger sensor seems to be better, we don't yet know what the quality of the lens is. I suppose we can assume both drones have the same lens quality, but we won't know until we start seeing images.
Not to harp on something I posted earlier, but flight stability IMO is as or more important than slight improvements in image quality.
flight stability also means maintaining gimbal angle upwind.. not getting props in frame when flying forward…
do you still think flight stability Is important?
Yes. I have a Mini 2 and a M2P and formerly a Mini1. 50% of the time the Mini 1 was unusable because of wind here even if the wind didn't present fly away danger. The M2P, or the Air2, with more power, isn't going to run into situations where the angle of a smaller drone would be tilted to the point where props would get into the picture. At least far less often.flight stability also means maintaining gimbal angle upwind.. not getting props in frame when flying forward…
do you still think flight stability Is important?
The drones which you own are notorious for tilting down the gimbal when moving forward in most flight modes. And upwind; all flight modes
Wreckhunter
Well-Known Member
The air 2 gimbal is fine in any wind condition I have run into so far.Over 300 flights so far with it.
All is fine.
If your current drones are “fine”, know that mini 3 pro is “vastly superior” in that regard
Similar threads
DJI Drone Deals
New Threads
-
-
-
Remembering the Zombie Apocalypse Drone Footage- Started by The Droning Company
- Replies: 2
-
-
Forum statistics
