I agree. If your main thing is video the comparison video above is pretty convincing. Newer sensor technology beats the older technology. For serious photographers though the jury is still out..
50MP 1" sensor a wise choice?
- Thread starter Filmarik
- Start date
Droning on and on...
Well-Known Member
Yes, and what gives this review cred with me is the careful setup, and showing the details of what his settings were. I could reproduce the results for myself and see what I get.
That's real scientific method. Not the used-car sales pitch we get fom Billy and the other carnival barkers.
Droning on and on...
Well-Known Member
Totally agree. QB sensors will never satisfy pixel-peepers. If the application requires that level of enlarged scrutiny, I side with the peepers.
ryguy80
Well-Known Member
Exactly! Anyone that starts off a video with “This <insert drone model> is a game changer!”, I roll my eyes.
Video is lot more forgiving in terms of sharpness requirement. Many videographers would argue that too much sharpness in video is not good and is detrimental to the coveted "cinematic look". For printing photographs though the sharpness and detail can be of a critical importance and can make or brake the resulting print.
Last edited:
Similar threads
