DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

Best and worst aspects of drone flying

"Well, you've done your part in gathering information. You should call your nearest FAA Field office and report it. It's very odd for him to be flying such aircraft and in such manner, being so far from any workable area (those things aren't cheap to operate either). The aircraft owner may also take exception to wasting fuel for no apparent reason. You could easily make his "joy rides" less enjoyable. Best of luck."

It seems there's a lot of jumping to conclusions about the intent of the pilot and his flight parameters. Not all such flights are related to agriculture. For instance, do you have a local mosquito control district or a problem with an insect infestation that's more widespread than the extent of local croplands? Such planes are also used for wildlands fire suppression. The state of Colorado owns a couple of them expressly for that purpose.
No Jumping to conclusions. Read my earlier post and you'll see I already made suggestions in that regard, to which the OP already responded that he had already looked into it.
As far as I am aware, the Agcat has been dropped in favor of the more efficient Air Tractor series for every operation, except agriculture...and that is dying, seeing that there hasn't been production since 1995. There are none in use for fire suppression at all.
 
Last edited:
Looks like there are a few drones flyers taking advantage of the shutdown in the NPS but mostly the other "criminals" are the base jumpers:

1761092104798.png


Government says it's fake, does this look fake?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Torque
I've never seen an eruption of Old Faithful that wasn't witnessed by hordes of visitors. I would be pretty hard to get away with a stunt like that and not be reported by somebody.
With a range of over a mile, I think it's possible to get away with it.
 
If getting away with something floats your boat, then you're probably right. On the other hand, if anyone in the crowd is offended and can access your RID, then you might be toast. As always, obeying the law is a good thing. My suggestion, if you must defy the law, is that you stay in Tampa and stay away from Yellowstone.
 
If getting away with something floats your boat, then you're probably right. On the other hand, if anyone in the crowd is offended and can access your RID, then you might be toast. As always, obeying the law is a good thing. My suggestion, if you must defy the law, is that you stay in Tampa and stay away from Yellowstone.
Laws don't mean anything if:
A) There's nobody to enforce them
B) There's no enforcement even if there is someone
C) You have enough money or stature to just thumb your nose at it and nobody will hold you to it
D) Are willing to suffer the consequences if caught breaking the law
E) (personal opinion) If nobody will be inconvenienced in any way if the law is broken.
 
Laws don't mean anything if:
A) There's nobody to enforce them
B) There's no enforcement even if there is someone
C) You have enough money or stature to just thumb your nose at it and nobody will hold you to it
D) Are willing to suffer the consequences if caught breaking the law
E) (personal opinion) If nobody will be inconvenienced in any way if the law is broken.
Just curious. Were you among those "patriots" who stormed and desecrated the capitol on January 6, 2020?
 
Just curious. Were you among those "patriots" who stormed and desecrated the capitol on January 6, 2020?
I don't discuss politics in a forum such as this but the answer is "no". I believe their actions harmed many people, the country, democracy, and they all should have been punished to the full extent of the law (and then some).

Since you asked nicely.
 
Sorry I have to advocate for drone use wherever it makes sense. I'm not necessarily looking to allow people to get fantastic shots or scenic photos but simply having a decent place to fly. If all state parks were open to drones by default with minor restrictions, we would be satisfied. But it's not and I have to advocate for national parks the same way I do for state parks, county parks, and city parks that implement strict bans for absolutely no reason other than "just because."

If we allow this mentality, we stand only to lose more and never gain and once again, drones will be flown in neighborhoods and city streets when they don't have to be. Maybe it's time we establish standalone "Drone parks" similar to "RC parks" not FRIAs. Let's call it that if it makes people feel better. People need somewhere other than private property to go fly their drone because I can understand the apprehension some flyers may feel flying over private property especially as it is becoming illegal in so many places.

I once heard lights and sirens coming in my direction and I thought nothing of it, I'm in a public park and I have been flying there for years but I see this patrol car approaching and once he sees me (and likely recognize me and what I am doing), he stands down and turns around...for sure. Been meaning to do a public records request to find out what that was all about.
Follow up to my post from last year on pointing out how the community is able to make progress. the same can be done for National Parks.

 

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
140,285
Messages
1,657,546
Members
168,284
Latest member
ATC_Marcoooo
Want to Remove this Ad? Simply login or create a free account