A year from now, yes because I enjoy it and much of my flying is in rural areas. I will learn and follow the new regulations as they roll out. But I do see a few trends, more and more groups (city, state, federal, quasi-public like universities, etc) are enacting regulations against flying (or more specifically - it's usually take offs/landings). The FAA is starting to put more restrictions on hobbyists. But I think the next step will be more restrictions on the 'amateur' 107 guys that do real estate photos and roof inspections.
I suspect that in 10 years, drones will be mostly used by folks like Amazon, UPS, insurance companies and the government. Individuals- whether they took the 107 or hobbyist test - will be more and more constrained to almost nonexistence.
Now it could be like Connecticut where state law requires large gun magazines registered but 99% of owners have ignored the law. But I suspect many new regulations are coming. It is easiest if the government goes after the manufacturers. I would not recommend buying DJI stock ( I know - it is a private company - I was kidding!)
There are alot more people in the US that enjoy cocaine than enjoy drone flying. And cocaine mostly affects the user while drones take down planes, kill wildlife, chops off kid's heads, and spys on people. ? So one can argue drones should be very tightly controlled preferably operated only by government and large corporations.
I hope I am paranoid. ? But I see an analogy to fireworks. 50 years ago anyone could buy fireworks but then the government restricted the public to only "sparklers" and only governments or large corporations (Disney) can purchase real fireworks. Most people were ok with that because they didn't buy fireworks and they worried "Crazy Fred" could catch their house on fire.
It like the comment above, "hobbyists will be limited, but I don't care, I have my 107 so it doesn't affect me". Most restrictions/regulations by government only impacts a minority and therefore most don't care.