here are many who are sticklers for rules. Take it with a grain of Sodium Chloride.
Oh dear, now this may be bad phrasing, again, on your part or my not understanding your humour or what you are trying to say.....but, if by some chance, you are referring to "FCC rules" breaching them and advocating breaching them, that merely enhances the impression that drone flyers are a group of reckless jerks who care nothing for the safety of others.
The purpose of FCC and other airspace authorities rules are, in general, to enhance the safety of aircraft. With respect to drones, which your FCC consider to be aircraft it seems obvious to me that the rules are primarily aimed at enhancing the safety of uninvolved people.
I would suggest that publicly flaunting breaches of those rule and publicly advocating the breaching of those rules opens the door to legislators
a) tightening regulation or
b) use other means to enhance the safety of others.
And actually encourages them to do so.
Drones are a somewhat unique entity, there ability to fly derives from the use of high speed computation and the software that performs that computation and it extremely ease to change that software.
As such legislators have two entirely separate lines of attack against drones.
1) tighten regulations, which they are already doing, just look at the situation in the EU with regards to where differ weight classes of drone can be flown.
2) and arguably far more effective, force manufacturers to install software that limits the drones capability. DJI already does this and has done so since I have known DJI drones.
I.e. the 500m maximum height limit that DJI have arbitrarily applied to all the drones that I have. There is nothing that I know of in the laws of physics/aeronautical-engineering that says there is a 500m threshold above which drones can not be flown.
If you need further evidence then again look at the situation in the EU where depending on which 'class' you want 'your'
mini 3 or perhaps
mini 4 to fly in, DJI's software enforces a 120m above-the-take-point ceiling. As I understand the EU rules such a limit is not written into the relevant laws and the legal height limit remains 120m AGL.
Given how 'easy' it is to change software how hard do you think it would for governments to turn around and say to drone manufactures "Write the following limitations into your drones,' software otherwise you will not given either or both
a) an import licence for your drones or
b) radio transmission compliance acceptance."
The latter is already a prospective threaten the sale of new future models of DJI drones in the USA.
Even if you have no regards for the rules yourself please consider the possible impact of your advocation on others.
If I am mistaken in my understanding of your post then I suggest you earn to express your thinking more precisely as clearly and REMEMBER, this is an international for where not everyone speaks American.
