WithTheBirds
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2018
- Messages
- 2,565
- Reactions
- 1,606
Say something nonsensical really loudly and run away with your fingers in your ears like the other 7 year olds....Not going to read any more replies, I want to keep the mental image that I've built of many users here so forgive me if I have (hopefully) echoed another.
The news being slung about this incident may very well be more accurate than I believe, and by extension those who believe most if not all of what the "news" delivers in the way of coverage for high profile incidents (typically in the form of repetitive short intense streams of information often vague and attributed to Anonymous Sources). I obviously do not buy most of the story and would ask that now that I have rather inexpertly delivered my opening statements in an inflammatory manner to take a brief moment to apply critical thinking to this situation and the coverage to date. Of note: battery life and its implication on loiter time over the target area, considering only the use of Mark I eyeballs and radios the remarkable ability for said operators to remain hidden given maximum operating distance from the target in such an RF and foliage crowded environment, motor lifetime when utilized for such extended periods, remarkable QC demonstrated by the lack of any failure on the part of the "culprits" gear, the failure of all proven commercial anti-drone products brought to bear by local authorities, and finally assuming a significantly eye-sight challenged group of law enforcement involved the inability to locate anyone using gear designed for the purpose. I would direct you to the recent "study" conducted in the U.S. near Embry-Riddle in Florida utilizing this technology to obtain make, model, serial, operator location etc.
Perhaps there are reasonable explanations for each of the (major) inconsistencies demonstrated in the incident as reported. I certainly do not have a reasonable alternative explanation, rather by applying logic and (estimated) probabilities to the troublesome circumstances / facts it is apparent to me that the "news" does not either.
badgenes
All your arguments prove irrelevant if you consider it was one or more sUAV performing multiple flights.