The articles that have been around lately claim higher efficiency in addition to reduced noise.Then the biggest downside with Toroidal props... the efficiency. Most examples I've seen means a 75% shorter flight time & that with a much reduced stability.
The team analyzed these weird-looking toroidal props to see whether there would be a thrust efficiency penalty. Apparently not: the team's best-performing B160 design was not only quieter at a given thrust level than the best standard propeller they tested, it also produced more thrust at a given power level
Where are the drone propellers?
Yep ... but not much have yet shown up, most are terrible efficiency wise.The articles that have been around lately claim higher efficiency in addition to reduced noise.
Looped propellers: A noise-killing game changer in air and water
These strangely-shaped twisted-loop propellers look like a revolutionary (sorry) advance for the aviation and marine sectors. Radically quieter than traditional propellers in both air and water, they're also showing some huge efficiency gains.newatlas.com
That's how YT's algorithm works... the more you look at a subject, the more of the same they feed you.They now pop up on my YouTube recommended too.
I agree. Actually, in the YT videos I've watched, they are actually louder.The Toroidal prop trade off efficiency for a quieter operation... but the keyword here is "should be" quieter, most of the drone toroidal props aren't, instead adding more blades to a conventional design usually win in that regard. Then the biggest downside with Toroidal props... the efficiency. Most examples I've seen means a 75% shorter flight time & that with a much reduced stability.
So no... in total Toroidal props on a drone isn't a success so far.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.