I’ve thought commercial viability was a long way off at the first indication of drone deliveries for consumer items was being pursued.
Payload and number of deliveries is just too limited in the current formats.
Even Zipline.
One van, one driver, many hundreds of deliveries daily.
That’s not to say one day there won’t be van sized drones with perhaps similar capacity for number of packages for a delivery run, and automated systems to do multiple deliveries etc, even if weight limitations are required for airborne payload capacity.
But right now just the urgent medical side of these formats, be they Ziplines larger drones in more remote airspace, or these smaller drones like this new Zipline concept in urban areas, make them viable.
Would commercial viability even need to be considered for urgent blood, medication, drugs etc to be quickly deployed across a city ?
Obviously someone has to pay for it, but financing this would probably be less than traditional means used now.
Vehicles, drivers, and associated costs.
Zipline type drones would / should be at least no more cost than current methods but be far more efficient in delivery and saving lives.
Ok, other urgent deliveries could have the premium added for this sort of drone delivery too.
Perhaps legal papers, and no doubt other such things that have an urgency greater than viability factors.
Zipline had a great history of success and viability, not sure how long a Walmart association will go on, but they can, and will most likely, be using this new format in medical supply delivery.